AAP logoAAP logo
Browse

Culture And Society


  • Africa Regional Democracy Fund – Togo
    Grant Size: $100,000 -500,000 Donor: US Mission to Togo The U.S. Embassy Lome through this Notice of Funding Opportunity, is pleased to announce an open competition for organizations to submit applications to carry out a program to promote inclusive civic engagement and bolster strong and independent democratic institutions. https://grants.gov/search-results-detail/355708
    By: Tony Milanzi

  • Africa Regional Democracy Fund – Togo
    Grant Size: $100,000 -500,000 Donor: US Mission to Togo The U.S. Embassy Lome through this Notice of Funding Opportunity, is pleased to announce an open competition for organizations to submit applications to carry out a program to promote inclusive civic engagement and bolster strong and independent democratic institutions. https://grants.gov/search-results-detail/355708 Read more
    By: Tony Milanzi
  • +6
    African Futures Cohort 5 - Call for Scholars
    The Alliance for African Partnership (AAP) is seeking applicants for the fifth cohort of the AAP African Futures Research Leadership Program. This competitive visiting scholar program supports early career researchers from the AAP consortium to work for one year under the mentorship of faculty members from MSU and their home institution, focusing on building skills in research for impact, writing scholarly and/or policy publications, disseminating of research results, and developing grant proposals for external support. Scholars will also participate in a structured professional development program while building bridges and lasting connections with MSU contacts and across their cohort.  The main objective of the African Futures program is to strengthen the capacity of a cadre of African researchers to return to their home institutions and become scientific leaders in their community, establish long-term partnerships with MSU faculty, co-create innovative solutions to Africa’s challenges, and in turn become trainers of the next generation of researchers. This program aims to address the gender gap in Africa, where only 30% of researchers are women, so scholars selected for the program will be women, or men who can demonstrate they are committed to support efforts towards gender equity in higher education institutions in Africa. The research areas that the scholars will engage in during the program should be aligned to AAP's research priority areas.  The AAP Management Team requests applications from early career researchers to participate in the next cohort, with work to begin virtually in February 2025. Scholars will spend September – December 2025 at MSU for the in-person portion of the program, followed by another period of virtual collaboration, ending in early 2026. The scholar and mentor team will receive a small grant for research and professional development activities including conference attendance and publication. Scholars will also receive a stipend during their time at MSU, visa application support, and round-trip travel from their home institution. Potential Research Areas  Selected scholars will work in one of AAP’s seven priority areas: Agri-food systems Water, Energy, and Environment Culture and Society Youth Empowerment Education Health and Nutrition Science, Technology, and Innovation Selected scholars will be paired with an MSU mentor and commit to working with the MSU mentor and the home institution mentor for the duration of the program.   Program Benefits  Professional development activities – AAP will offer structured professional development workshops centered on topics such as building equitable partnerships, academic time management, proposal development and budgeting, research communication, etc. to establish professional trajectories, to build research, writing, and publishing skills, and to support scholars to move through various stages of review, promotion, and growth.  Leadership activities – this will center on a research leadership retreat to expose scholars to the key competencies of research leaders, the work that research leaders engage in, personal reflection on their characteristics and career goals to help determine the pathway to advancement to research leadership. Collaboration networks – the early career researcher will be co-mentored by an MSU faculty member and a faculty member from their home institution. Mentors will have the opportunity to visit their counterpart for one week during the duration of the program. The scholar will also gain access to AAP’s broad network of researchers at MSU, across Africa, and beyond. Proposed activities should ultimately lead to potential long-term collaborations between MSU and the partner institution.    Expected Outcomes Each scholar and mentors are expected to produce the following outputs, at minimum, by the end of the program: Submission or evidence of publication of one to three joint manuscripts At least one grant proposal application At least one conference presentation Collaborations with mentors are meant to be long-term and continue after the end of the program. Scholars are encouraged to network with MSU faculty beyond their mentor while at MSU. Scholars are expected to submit regular progress reports to AAP and their home institution focal point. Failure to meet program and mentor expectations can result in early dismissal. Eligibility  Citizen of an African country  Completion of a PhD degree within the last 10 years  Employed as an Academic Staff member at one of the AAP African consortium universities including Egerton University, Makerere University, University of Dar es Salaam, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Botswana, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, University Cheikh Anta Diop, University of Arts and Humanities, Bamako, United States International University-Africa, and University of Pretoria  Have documented approval of leave or sabbatical to participate in the program for the in-person period  Have a mentor at their home institution that will serve as a collaborator and mentor Research must be in one of the AAP priority areas Applicants may only submit one proposal to AAP in this round of funding. Prior scholars are not eligible to apply.  Application Requirements  Applicants should provide the following documents as part of their application package:  An up-to-date curriculum vitae (CV) that provides a chronological review of their professional accomplishments  A letter of interest that demonstrates how their research interest and experience is aligned to the AAP research priority area and how they plan to implement long-term sustainable partnership (1 pages) (for male applicants) include how they have supported efforts towards gender equity in higher education institutions in Africa Names of potential mentors at MSU (applicants should browse relevant MSU department’s website to identify up to three faculty that are aligned with their research interests. Applicants should not contact MSU faculty directly - AAP will reach out on the applicant’s behalf) Two publications in refereed journals related to their research area  Two professional references that detail the relationship to the applicant and provide specific examples of their assessment of the expertise of the applicant’s research area  A letter from the mentor at their home institution indicating willingness to serve as a collaborator during the program, travel to MSU for one week of collaboration discussions, and mentor the early career researcher when they return to their home institution (1 page)  A written endorsement from the applicants’ Head of Department approving leave (1 page)  A letter of support from the AAP Focal Point for the scholar’s application (1 page) Selection Criteria:  Professional merit, scientific ability, potential career impact and future collaboration goals with MSU faculty (based on CV, letter of interest, publications, Head of dept and home mentor letters, and two reference letters)  Assurance and availability of resources from the home institution for a designated, funded position for the early career researcher upon completion of their fellowship (expressed in letter from head of Dept at the home institution)  Commitment to return to their home country following completion of training (expressed in a letter of interest)  The selection committee will ensure the best match of outstanding candidates and MSU mentors Additional selection factors may include diversity in scientific research areas and geographic origin  Applications are due on August 18, 2024  Apply: https://msu.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_a60s40TOPXGO5sq   Additional program dates: Program start date (virtual): February 2025 In-person program: Sept - Dec 2025 Program end date: February 2026 Questions  Please contact José Jackson-Malete at  jacks184@msu.edu  or +1 517-884-8587 with any questions. 
    By: Justin Rabineau
    poster image
  • +6
    African Futures Cohort 5 - Call for Scholars
    The Alliance for African Partnership (AAP) is seeking applicants for the fifth cohort of the AAP African Futures Research Leadership Program. This competitive visiting scholar program supports early career researchers from the AAP consortium to work for one year under the mentorship of faculty members from MSU and their home institution, focusing on building skills in research for impact, writing scholarly and/or policy publications, disseminating of research results, and developing grant proposals for external support. Scholars will also participate in a structured professional development program while building bridges and lasting connections with MSU contacts and across their cohort.  The main objective of the African Futures program is to strengthen the capacity of a cadre of African researchers to return to their home institutions and become scientific leaders in their community, establish long-term partnerships with MSU faculty, co-create innovative solutions to Africa’s challenges, and in turn become trainers of the next generation of researchers. This program aims to address the gender gap in Africa, where only 30% of researchers are women, so scholars selected for the program will be women, or men who can demonstrate they are committed to support efforts towards gender equity in higher education institutions in Africa. The research areas that the scholars will engage in during the program should be aligned to AAP's research priority areas.  The AAP Management Team requests applications from early career researchers to participate in the next cohort, with work to begin virtually in February 2025. Scholars will spend September – December 2025 at MSU for the in-person portion of the program, followed by another period of virtual collaboration, ending in early 2026. The scholar and mentor team will receive a small grant for research and professional development activities including conference attendance and publication. Scholars will also receive a stipend during their time at MSU, visa application support, and round-trip travel from their home institution. Potential Research Areas  Selected scholars will work in one of AAP’s seven priority areas: Agri-food systems Water, Energy, and Environment Culture and Society Youth Empowerment Education Health and Nutrition Science, Technology, and Innovation Selected scholars will be paired with an MSU mentor and commit to working with the MSU mentor and the home institution mentor for the duration of the program.   Program Benefits  Professional development activities – AAP will offer structured professional development workshops centered on topics such as building equitable partnerships, academic time management, proposal development and budgeting, research communication, etc. to establish professional trajectories, to build research, writing, and publishing skills, and to support scholars to move through various stages of review, promotion, and growth.  Leadership activities – this will center on a research leadership retreat to expose scholars to the key competencies of research leaders, the work that research leaders engage in, personal reflection on their characteristics and career goals to help determine the pathway to advancement to research leadership. Collaboration networks – the early career researcher will be co-mentored by an MSU faculty member and a faculty member from their home institution. Mentors will have the opportunity to visit their counterpart for one week during the duration of the program. The scholar will also gain access to AAP’s broad network of researchers at MSU, across Africa, and beyond. Proposed activities should ultimately lead to potential long-term collaborations between MSU and the partner institution.    Expected Outcomes Each scholar and mentors are expected to produce the following outputs, at minimum, by the end of the program: Submission or evidence of publication of one to three joint manuscripts At least one grant proposal application At least one conference presentation Collaborations with mentors are meant to be long-term and continue after the end of the program. Scholars are encouraged to network with MSU faculty beyond their mentor while at MSU. Scholars are expected to submit regular progress reports to AAP and their home institution focal point. Failure to meet program and mentor expectations can result in early dismissal. Eligibility  Citizen of an African country  Completion of a PhD degree within the last 10 years  Employed as an Academic Staff member at one of the AAP African consortium universities including Egerton University, Makerere University, University of Dar es Salaam, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Botswana, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, University Cheikh Anta Diop, University of Arts and Humanities, Bamako, United States International University-Africa, and University of Pretoria  Have documented approval of leave or sabbatical to participate in the program for the in-person period  Have a mentor at their home institution that will serve as a collaborator and mentor Research must be in one of the AAP priority areas Applicants may only submit one proposal to AAP in this round of funding. Prior scholars are not eligible to apply.  Application Requirements  Applicants should provide the following documents as part of their application package:  An up-to-date curriculum vitae (CV) that provides a chronological review of their professional accomplishments  A letter of interest that demonstrates how their research interest and experience is aligned to the AAP research priority area and how they plan to implement long-term sustainable partnership (1 pages) (for male applicants) include how they have supported efforts towards gender equity in higher education institutions in Africa Names of potential mentors at MSU (applicants should browse relevant MSU department’s website to identify up to three faculty that are aligned with their research interests. Applicants should not contact MSU faculty directly - AAP will reach out on the applicant’s behalf) Two publications in refereed journals related to their research area  Two professional references that detail the relationship to the applicant and provide specific examples of their assessment of the expertise of the applicant’s research area  A letter from the mentor at their home institution indicating willingness to serve as a collaborator during the program, travel to MSU for one week of collaboration discussions, and mentor the early career researcher when they return to their home institution (1 page)  A written endorsement from the applicants’ Head of Department approving leave (1 page)  A letter of support from the AAP Focal Point for the scholar’s application (1 page) Selection Criteria:  Professional merit, scientific ability, potential career impact and future collaboration goals with MSU faculty (based on CV, letter of interest, publications, Head of dept and home mentor letters, and two reference letters)  Assurance and availability of resources from the home institution for a designated, funded position for the early career researcher upon completion of their fellowship (expressed in letter from head of Dept at the home institution)  Commitment to return to their home country following completion of training (expressed in a letter of interest)  The selection committee will ensure the best match of outstanding candidates and MSU mentors Additional selection factors may include diversity in scientific research areas and geographic origin  Applications are due on August 18, 2024  Apply: https://msu.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_a60s40TOPXGO5sq   Additional program dates: Program start date (virtual): February 2025 In-person program: Sept - Dec 2025 Program end date: February 2026 Questions  Please contact José Jackson-Malete at  jacks184@msu.edu  or +1 517-884-8587 with any questions.  Read more
    By: Justin Rabineau
    poster image
  • +2
    Transformative Opportunities with the AAP Professional Fellowship Program (PFP)
    Transformative Opportunities with the AAP Professional Fellowship Program (PFP)  In May-June 2024, AAP hosted 11 African fellows from Rwanda, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe at Michigan State University (MSU) as part of the US Department of State-funded Professional Fellows Program. The Advancing Young Women Agribusiness Entrepreneurs and Innovators is administered by MSU in partnership with the University of Rwanda, the University of Pretoria (South Africa), the University of Zambia, and Chinhoyi University of Technology (Zimbabwe). The goal of the program is to build Fellows’ capacity and skills in agro-entrepreneurship and agri-food system innovation and advance their ability to support women’s economic empowerment.   One of the standout features of our PFP is the professional affiliations. Throughout the program, fellows are paired with organizations and mentors that align with their projects, fostering long-term partnerships and impactful collaborations. This unique aspect ensures that fellows not only gain valuable insights but also build enduring professional networks. For example, Vimbai Kaitano, a Zimbabwean farmer and owner of Carol’s Seedlings and Vegetables, was hosted by Bridget Kavanaugh of Happy Goat Lucky Ewe Fiber Farm. While their farms focus on very different commodities, the two farmers and business owners, shared lessons on farm management, value addition, and marketing their small businesses. Robert Rwigema from Rwanda and Precious Nemutenzi from Zimbabwe were hosted by Peter Lemmer and Elana Fata from Greenstone Farm Credit Services. Greenstone arranged a robust experience that allowed these two agribusiness professionals to learn in detail about its farm credit financial services and to connect with many of its client farmers.  Our PFP is packed with exciting activities, including dinners, delicious food, and networking opportunities. Fellows have the chance to connect, with host families and organizations, and with MSU researchers and students, creating a vibrant and supportive community. These events are perfect for cultural exchange and building lasting relationships. We believe in continuous learning and development. This cohort of fellows was hosted by several local volunteer families for dinners in their homes. They also attended a Broadway musical at MSU’s Wharton Center for the Performing Arts, went to a Lansing Lugnuts baseball game, and had a bowling night with members of MSU’s African Graduate Student Association.  The PFP offers an array of seminars and workshops designed to contribute significantly to our fellows' professional and personal growth. These sessions cover various topics, providing fellows with the skills and knowledge they need to excel. Dr. Wynne Wright, co-director of MSU’s PFP program, delivered workshops on understanding gender dynamics in agri-food systems. Professor Brian Petland from MSU’s Eli Broad College of Business delivered an interactive session on approaches to project management. Raymond Musiima, a PFP alum from 2019 and a current MSU MBA student, provided insights on building and maintaining professional networks. Melissa Staub from MSU’s College of Arts and Letters led a series of workshops on personal development and leadership.  Our program also includes exciting site visits and field trips. These immersive experiences allow fellows to gain practical insights and hands-on learning in various fields. By exploring different environments and contexts, fellows enhance their understanding and apply their skills in real-world settings. Fellows from this cohort visited Detroit where they met up with W.E. DaCruz, Co-Founder of the Mushroom Angel company which uses mushrooms to produce vegan burgers. They also traveled to Super Bloom Hydroponic Farm in Grand Rapids, Michigan where they learned about hydroponic farming. PFP Co-Director, Dr. Wynne Wright hosted the fellows on her lavender farm, Sixteen Sprigs.   As we conclude another successful year of the AAP Professional Fellowship Program, we are excited to announce our plans for an outbound trip to visit fellows in their home countries in early October. This will provide an excellent opportunity to further strengthen our international collaborations and witness firsthand the impactful work our fellows are doing in their communities. Additionally, we eagerly look forward to hosting the next cohort of fellows in 2025, continuing our commitment to empowering young women in agribusiness and fostering transformative opportunities in agro-entrepreneurship and agri-food system innovation.     
    By: Baboki Gaolaolwe-Major
    post image
  • +2
    Transformative Opportunities with the AAP Professional Fellowship Program (PFP)
    Transformative Opportunities with the AAP Professional Fellowship Program (PFP)  In May-June 2024, AAP hosted 11 African fellows from Rwanda, South Africa, Zambia, and Zimbabwe at Michigan State University (MSU) as part of the US Department of State-funded Professional Fellows Program. The Advancing Young Women Agribusiness Entrepreneurs and Innovators is administered by MSU in partnership with the University of Rwanda, the University of Pretoria (South Africa), the University of Zambia, and Chinhoyi University of Technology (Zimbabwe). The goal of the program is to build Fellows’ capacity and skills in agro-entrepreneurship and agri-food system innovation and advance their ability to support women’s economic empowerment.   One of the standout features of our PFP is the professional affiliations. Throughout the program, fellows are paired with organizations and mentors that align with their projects, fostering long-term partnerships and impactful collaborations. This unique aspect ensures that fellows not only gain valuable insights but also build enduring professional networks. For example, Vimbai Kaitano, a Zimbabwean farmer and owner of Carol’s Seedlings and Vegetables, was hosted by Bridget Kavanaugh of Happy Goat Lucky Ewe Fiber Farm. While their farms focus on very different commodities, the two farmers and business owners, shared lessons on farm management, value addition, and marketing their small businesses. Robert Rwigema from Rwanda and Precious Nemutenzi from Zimbabwe were hosted by Peter Lemmer and Elana Fata from Greenstone Farm Credit Services. Greenstone arranged a robust experience that allowed these two agribusiness professionals to learn in detail about its farm credit financial services and to connect with many of its client farmers.  Our PFP is packed with exciting activities, including dinners, delicious food, and networking opportunities. Fellows have the chance to connect, with host families and organizations, and with MSU researchers and students, creating a vibrant and supportive community. These events are perfect for cultural exchange and building lasting relationships. We believe in continuous learning and development. This cohort of fellows was hosted by several local volunteer families for dinners in their homes. They also attended a Broadway musical at MSU’s Wharton Center for the Performing Arts, went to a Lansing Lugnuts baseball game, and had a bowling night with members of MSU’s African Graduate Student Association.  The PFP offers an array of seminars and workshops designed to contribute significantly to our fellows' professional and personal growth. These sessions cover various topics, providing fellows with the skills and knowledge they need to excel. Dr. Wynne Wright, co-director of MSU’s PFP program, delivered workshops on understanding gender dynamics in agri-food systems. Professor Brian Petland from MSU’s Eli Broad College of Business delivered an interactive session on approaches to project management. Raymond Musiima, a PFP alum from 2019 and a current MSU MBA student, provided insights on building and maintaining professional networks. Melissa Staub from MSU’s College of Arts and Letters led a series of workshops on personal development and leadership.  Our program also includes exciting site visits and field trips. These immersive experiences allow fellows to gain practical insights and hands-on learning in various fields. By exploring different environments and contexts, fellows enhance their understanding and apply their skills in real-world settings. Fellows from this cohort visited Detroit where they met up with W.E. DaCruz, Co-Founder of the Mushroom Angel company which uses mushrooms to produce vegan burgers. They also traveled to Super Bloom Hydroponic Farm in Grand Rapids, Michigan where they learned about hydroponic farming. PFP Co-Director, Dr. Wynne Wright hosted the fellows on her lavender farm, Sixteen Sprigs.   As we conclude another successful year of the AAP Professional Fellowship Program, we are excited to announce our plans for an outbound trip to visit fellows in their home countries in early October. This will provide an excellent opportunity to further strengthen our international collaborations and witness firsthand the impactful work our fellows are doing in their communities. Additionally, we eagerly look forward to hosting the next cohort of fellows in 2025, continuing our commitment to empowering young women in agribusiness and fostering transformative opportunities in agro-entrepreneurship and agri-food system innovation.      Read more
    By: Baboki Gaolaolwe-Major
    post image
  • +1
    ADVANCED DEGREES COMMENCEMENT CEREMONY - SPEECH BY BOLAJI BALOGUN, CEO, CHAPEL HILL DENHAM
    Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished faculty members, proud parents, spouses, friends, family, and most importantly, the 2024 Advanced Degrees graduating class of MSU, Good Afternoon. I am delighted to be here with you today and I am humbled to have this honour and privilege.  Thanks to Dan Kelly, the Chair of the Board and the Trustees; President Kevin M. Guskiewicz; Congratulations and MSU is in thoughtful hands; Interim Provost & Executive Vice President Thomas D. Jeitschko; Senior Vice Presidents; Vice Presidents; Deans, and in particular, Vice Provost Steven D. Hanson, Dean of International Studies and Programs, who I met in Nigeria in September 2022. Thank you for your kind letter at the passing of my father, Michael Olasubomi Balogun, in May 2023. Dean Judith Whipple, Acting Dean, Eli Broad College of Business and Graduate School of Management, who have graciously hosted me during this visit – and other Senior Administrators of this great institution. I must acknowledge Soji Adelaja, John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor in Land Policy and Chairman of the Board, at Chapel Hill Denham.   I commend the Professors and faculty who have dedicated themselves to producing the graduates seated in the hall today. To the parents, spouses, partners, children, family, friends and loved ones of today’s graduates, your support is truly commendable. As a father, I understand the commitment and sacrifice you have made financially and through advice and mentoring. My wife and biggest cheerleader, Kemi and 2 of our children, our daughters Michele & Marianne – are seated somewhere in the stands. Our other children, Michael, Michaela & Matthew, I wish they were here. I must mention my late Mum, Professor Wale Osisanya, Professor of English at the University of Lagos, where she was on the faculty for 35 years and gave everything for my educational foundation and values. She always hoped that after my Economics degree at the London School of Economics, I would do a Masters degree and then go get a Doctorate. Not quite the way you imagined, Mum, but nevertheless, I hope you are proud.  To today’s graduates, I congratulate you heartily and you have worked very hard to earn your degrees from a leading research university with a stellar global reputation, especially in Africa. I commend your collective spirit, dedication, and perseverance, which we are celebrating today.   For many when we think about MSU, we see an institution that epitomises the power of education to change lives. Given its rich tradition as a land grant university, academic excellence, innovative research, vibrant community spirit and commitment to global engagement, MSU is an impressive institution. It is also the US University most engaged with Africa, through the work of the Alliance for African Partnership.  I have spent the last couple of days on the sprawling, East Lansing campus interacting with faculty and students here, what has made an impression on me, is the commitment to produce well-rounded individuals who are equipped to make meaningful contributions to society. Your time at MSU has equipped you with more than just knowledge and a Doctorate. It has provided you with a diverse set of perspectives, practical learning, innovation, all of which are invaluable as you embark on your next steps.  You are in that less than 1% of people globally who have a Doctoral degree and you are both lucky and at the same time under pressure to provide the less well read 99% of us, some leadership. And so what right does this Nigerian and African, who did not get a Doctoral degree, have to share these thoughts with you?    Some of you may be wondering “What next?”. Armed with your MSU PhD or Doctoral degree, please allow me to share today no more than 4 pieces of advice or life lessons, a potential pathway that might make the next few years and your actions, decisions, and investments have a real impact. First piece of advice - Work Hard and Enlarge your Influence. Second piece of advice - Work Smart and Live a Life of Significance. Third piece of advice - Spend Time with your Loved Ones and Travel a lot with them, as Travel is the Enemy of Ignorance. Final piece of advice, I want to speak to you about something that I truly believe will be a part of your future but only a few of us have it in our contemplation – We all need an Africa plan.   Work Hard and Enlarge your Influence – You will find that you only have 25-35 years to work hard before you start getting old and tired. Do not waste those years of your prime and use these years to enlarge your influence or your coast by being the very best version of whatever you do. I believe that a few things make us truly influential – Knowledge, Success, Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Relationships and Charity.  Work Smart and Live a Life of Significance – The quickest path to these things, I have just spoken about is to work not just hard but smart and live a life of meaning or purpose or significance. You need not be a wealthy entrepreneur or banker or tech entrepreneur or investor or property owner or farming business owner or politician or creative genius or sports star, to live a life of significance. It is a choice that you make whether in a long career in academia or in medicine or in charitable work or not for profit or in God’s work, or as a spouse, father, sibling, mentor that your life will be impactful in your community, state, country or the world and that when you finally bow out, it is said that you lived a life of significance.  Spend time with your loved ones and travel a lot with them, as travel is the enemy of ignorance. This time is truly priceless, and you cannot make up for it or reinvent it at the end of your career or later in life. Travel together and see the world and not just visit New York, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Dallas, Boston, Nashville, and Atlanta. Latin America and the Caribbean are a short hop away from you. Europe and the UK offer something different history and culture wise, but you have only lived a well-rounded life, when you have travelled to or in Asia, the Middle East, Israel, and Africa, especially Nigeria.   Now, when I speak of Africa, I am not referring to a singular country or big village, where everyone knows everyone as some believe. Rather, I am speaking about 54 countries with diverse cultures, languages, and governments. Let me also clear this up that stepping out of any African airport does not mean having to dodge lions, elephants, and the occasional cheetah. Yes, the wildlife in Africa is unmatched and impressive, but you are more likely to experience a traffic jam and lots of colour, on your daily commute.    As a financier I am going to speak to you about Africa in numbers…   Demography is destiny – Africa is 10% of the world’s population today but when you retire later this century, it will be 1/3rd of the world’s population. That population will not be isolated from you, and already, Africans have migrated across the world and will be integrated with every major economy globally. 1 in 4 babies are African … 1 in 10 babies are Nigerian … today. By 2100, the share of the world’s babies born in sub-Saharan Africa is forecast to reach 55% from 30% in 2021. This transition is inevitable.  401(k) - When you start accumulating your 401(k) you will find that you are immediately invested in Africa, as every major global company s already there. Coca-Cola and Pepsico are available throughout the continent, as are Visa and Mastercard, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta are investing. The largest American REITs American Towers and Equinix (DC’s) are huge in Africa. All the major resource companies are in Africa. By the time you retire, I predict your 401(k) will have African home-grown brands like MTN, Dangote, Access, Flutterwave, behemoths.  AfCFTA - The African freezone is the largest of its kind covering 54 countries and by the 2nd half of this century, a third of the world’s population. Goldman Sachs research estimates AfCFTA will be 50% larger than the EU by 2075 but that analysis excludes Africa’s diaspora or international GDP which, like Mexico, could easily represent 11 to 12x diaspora remittances; that is 40% of total African spending power today.  Infrastructure multiplier – We are taught that infrastructure has a huge multiplier impact on GDP and in creating jobs and opportunities. But the impact of the first or early infrastructure investments in your community … electricity, mobile phones, internet access, roads … is much larger than simply upgrading your 4G coverage to 5G. Basic infrastructure is unleashing a continent and growth rates will reflect that.  Climate - If Africa develops like the US, or the rest of the OECD and G20 has with the same carbon per capita, it will destroy the world’s climate targets. In order to build a low carbon development path, Africa requires capital and know-how along with its abundant renewable resources for the energy transition.   We are taught that risks are balanced, like a bell curve. Positives and negatives. In hindsight, the development of China, India, or Indonesia, over the last 25 years has been inevitable. Population growth, low leverage, low dependency ratios, high growth, cheap valuations has made this an asymmetric bet.  Africa is no different today. Africa can feed the world, resource, and power large parts of the world, support the world, entertain the world and, in NBA terms, beat the world! Africa’s narrative about Africa, is becoming more reflective of its truth, and the continent is rapidly emerging a global powerhouse.    Africa has 65% of the world’s arable land and 60% of the world’s uncultivated land, as well as 10% of the world’s internal renewable fresh water. When one considers this alongside the increasing focus on sustainable agricultural practices, Africa can solve the food security challenges within the continent and globally with expertise in biotechnology, agricultural sciences, land policy and supply chain management.   Africa is home to 30% of the world’s mineral reserves but accounts for just 10% of global mining exploration spend, there are significant, unverified additional reserves across the continent. The continent is home to around 65% of EV minerals lithium, cobalt, graphite, manganese etc. Africa's untapped potential for renewable energy sources, is compelling. Africa is home to 60% of the best solar resources globally, yet only 1% of installed solar PV capacity. A small part of the Sahara could power the EU or the world. Africa's wind resource potential is as high as 59,000GW and hydro- power potential is 1,750 GW.  Over 60% of Africa’s population is under the age of 25 and is the driver of growth. The economic rise of China and India were the first great shocks of this century. Africa’s rising youthful tide will most likely drive the next seismic shift. Africa is changing so rapidly it is becoming hard to ignore. The world is becoming more African, said a recent New York Times headline. The world is changing, and we need to reimagine Africa’s place in it.   As you start on this new journey, remember that with every change, there are always opportunities to explore. Be bold, resilient, embrace diversity, show empathy, stand strong, and always strive for a more equitable and prosperous future for all. There might be times you fail, or face challenges that seem insurmountable, but your indomitable Spartan spirit has been nurtured within these halls of learning and I hope that you will find the strength to keep moving and succeed.   Today, you are not just advanced degree graduates of Michigan State University; you are global citizens, poised to make a difference in the world. Congratulations, Class of 2024. The world is yours to shape, and to improve. Never forget that the impossible is the untried, so please go out and make a difference.  Thank you all and God speed. 
    By: Baboki Gaolaolwe-Major
    post image
  • +1
    ADVANCED DEGREES COMMENCEMENT CEREMONY - SPEECH BY BOLAJI BALOGUN, CEO, CHAPEL HILL DENHAM
    Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished faculty members, proud parents, spouses, friends, family, and most importantly, the 2024 Advanced Degrees graduating class of MSU, Good Afternoon. I am delighted to be here with you today and I am humbled to have this honour and privilege.  Thanks to Dan Kelly, the Chair of the Board and the Trustees; President Kevin M. Guskiewicz; Congratulations and MSU is in thoughtful hands; Interim Provost & Executive Vice President Thomas D. Jeitschko; Senior Vice Presidents; Vice Presidents; Deans, and in particular, Vice Provost Steven D. Hanson, Dean of International Studies and Programs, who I met in Nigeria in September 2022. Thank you for your kind letter at the passing of my father, Michael Olasubomi Balogun, in May 2023. Dean Judith Whipple, Acting Dean, Eli Broad College of Business and Graduate School of Management, who have graciously hosted me during this visit – and other Senior Administrators of this great institution. I must acknowledge Soji Adelaja, John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor in Land Policy and Chairman of the Board, at Chapel Hill Denham.   I commend the Professors and faculty who have dedicated themselves to producing the graduates seated in the hall today. To the parents, spouses, partners, children, family, friends and loved ones of today’s graduates, your support is truly commendable. As a father, I understand the commitment and sacrifice you have made financially and through advice and mentoring. My wife and biggest cheerleader, Kemi and 2 of our children, our daughters Michele & Marianne – are seated somewhere in the stands. Our other children, Michael, Michaela & Matthew, I wish they were here. I must mention my late Mum, Professor Wale Osisanya, Professor of English at the University of Lagos, where she was on the faculty for 35 years and gave everything for my educational foundation and values. She always hoped that after my Economics degree at the London School of Economics, I would do a Masters degree and then go get a Doctorate. Not quite the way you imagined, Mum, but nevertheless, I hope you are proud.  To today’s graduates, I congratulate you heartily and you have worked very hard to earn your degrees from a leading research university with a stellar global reputation, especially in Africa. I commend your collective spirit, dedication, and perseverance, which we are celebrating today.   For many when we think about MSU, we see an institution that epitomises the power of education to change lives. Given its rich tradition as a land grant university, academic excellence, innovative research, vibrant community spirit and commitment to global engagement, MSU is an impressive institution. It is also the US University most engaged with Africa, through the work of the Alliance for African Partnership.  I have spent the last couple of days on the sprawling, East Lansing campus interacting with faculty and students here, what has made an impression on me, is the commitment to produce well-rounded individuals who are equipped to make meaningful contributions to society. Your time at MSU has equipped you with more than just knowledge and a Doctorate. It has provided you with a diverse set of perspectives, practical learning, innovation, all of which are invaluable as you embark on your next steps.  You are in that less than 1% of people globally who have a Doctoral degree and you are both lucky and at the same time under pressure to provide the less well read 99% of us, some leadership. And so what right does this Nigerian and African, who did not get a Doctoral degree, have to share these thoughts with you?    Some of you may be wondering “What next?”. Armed with your MSU PhD or Doctoral degree, please allow me to share today no more than 4 pieces of advice or life lessons, a potential pathway that might make the next few years and your actions, decisions, and investments have a real impact. First piece of advice - Work Hard and Enlarge your Influence. Second piece of advice - Work Smart and Live a Life of Significance. Third piece of advice - Spend Time with your Loved Ones and Travel a lot with them, as Travel is the Enemy of Ignorance. Final piece of advice, I want to speak to you about something that I truly believe will be a part of your future but only a few of us have it in our contemplation – We all need an Africa plan.   Work Hard and Enlarge your Influence – You will find that you only have 25-35 years to work hard before you start getting old and tired. Do not waste those years of your prime and use these years to enlarge your influence or your coast by being the very best version of whatever you do. I believe that a few things make us truly influential – Knowledge, Success, Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Relationships and Charity.  Work Smart and Live a Life of Significance – The quickest path to these things, I have just spoken about is to work not just hard but smart and live a life of meaning or purpose or significance. You need not be a wealthy entrepreneur or banker or tech entrepreneur or investor or property owner or farming business owner or politician or creative genius or sports star, to live a life of significance. It is a choice that you make whether in a long career in academia or in medicine or in charitable work or not for profit or in God’s work, or as a spouse, father, sibling, mentor that your life will be impactful in your community, state, country or the world and that when you finally bow out, it is said that you lived a life of significance.  Spend time with your loved ones and travel a lot with them, as travel is the enemy of ignorance. This time is truly priceless, and you cannot make up for it or reinvent it at the end of your career or later in life. Travel together and see the world and not just visit New York, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Dallas, Boston, Nashville, and Atlanta. Latin America and the Caribbean are a short hop away from you. Europe and the UK offer something different history and culture wise, but you have only lived a well-rounded life, when you have travelled to or in Asia, the Middle East, Israel, and Africa, especially Nigeria.   Now, when I speak of Africa, I am not referring to a singular country or big village, where everyone knows everyone as some believe. Rather, I am speaking about 54 countries with diverse cultures, languages, and governments. Let me also clear this up that stepping out of any African airport does not mean having to dodge lions, elephants, and the occasional cheetah. Yes, the wildlife in Africa is unmatched and impressive, but you are more likely to experience a traffic jam and lots of colour, on your daily commute.    As a financier I am going to speak to you about Africa in numbers…   Demography is destiny – Africa is 10% of the world’s population today but when you retire later this century, it will be 1/3rd of the world’s population. That population will not be isolated from you, and already, Africans have migrated across the world and will be integrated with every major economy globally. 1 in 4 babies are African … 1 in 10 babies are Nigerian … today. By 2100, the share of the world’s babies born in sub-Saharan Africa is forecast to reach 55% from 30% in 2021. This transition is inevitable.  401(k) - When you start accumulating your 401(k) you will find that you are immediately invested in Africa, as every major global company s already there. Coca-Cola and Pepsico are available throughout the continent, as are Visa and Mastercard, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta are investing. The largest American REITs American Towers and Equinix (DC’s) are huge in Africa. All the major resource companies are in Africa. By the time you retire, I predict your 401(k) will have African home-grown brands like MTN, Dangote, Access, Flutterwave, behemoths.  AfCFTA - The African freezone is the largest of its kind covering 54 countries and by the 2nd half of this century, a third of the world’s population. Goldman Sachs research estimates AfCFTA will be 50% larger than the EU by 2075 but that analysis excludes Africa’s diaspora or international GDP which, like Mexico, could easily represent 11 to 12x diaspora remittances; that is 40% of total African spending power today.  Infrastructure multiplier – We are taught that infrastructure has a huge multiplier impact on GDP and in creating jobs and opportunities. But the impact of the first or early infrastructure investments in your community … electricity, mobile phones, internet access, roads … is much larger than simply upgrading your 4G coverage to 5G. Basic infrastructure is unleashing a continent and growth rates will reflect that.  Climate - If Africa develops like the US, or the rest of the OECD and G20 has with the same carbon per capita, it will destroy the world’s climate targets. In order to build a low carbon development path, Africa requires capital and know-how along with its abundant renewable resources for the energy transition.   We are taught that risks are balanced, like a bell curve. Positives and negatives. In hindsight, the development of China, India, or Indonesia, over the last 25 years has been inevitable. Population growth, low leverage, low dependency ratios, high growth, cheap valuations has made this an asymmetric bet.  Africa is no different today. Africa can feed the world, resource, and power large parts of the world, support the world, entertain the world and, in NBA terms, beat the world! Africa’s narrative about Africa, is becoming more reflective of its truth, and the continent is rapidly emerging a global powerhouse.    Africa has 65% of the world’s arable land and 60% of the world’s uncultivated land, as well as 10% of the world’s internal renewable fresh water. When one considers this alongside the increasing focus on sustainable agricultural practices, Africa can solve the food security challenges within the continent and globally with expertise in biotechnology, agricultural sciences, land policy and supply chain management.   Africa is home to 30% of the world’s mineral reserves but accounts for just 10% of global mining exploration spend, there are significant, unverified additional reserves across the continent. The continent is home to around 65% of EV minerals lithium, cobalt, graphite, manganese etc. Africa's untapped potential for renewable energy sources, is compelling. Africa is home to 60% of the best solar resources globally, yet only 1% of installed solar PV capacity. A small part of the Sahara could power the EU or the world. Africa's wind resource potential is as high as 59,000GW and hydro- power potential is 1,750 GW.  Over 60% of Africa’s population is under the age of 25 and is the driver of growth. The economic rise of China and India were the first great shocks of this century. Africa’s rising youthful tide will most likely drive the next seismic shift. Africa is changing so rapidly it is becoming hard to ignore. The world is becoming more African, said a recent New York Times headline. The world is changing, and we need to reimagine Africa’s place in it.   As you start on this new journey, remember that with every change, there are always opportunities to explore. Be bold, resilient, embrace diversity, show empathy, stand strong, and always strive for a more equitable and prosperous future for all. There might be times you fail, or face challenges that seem insurmountable, but your indomitable Spartan spirit has been nurtured within these halls of learning and I hope that you will find the strength to keep moving and succeed.   Today, you are not just advanced degree graduates of Michigan State University; you are global citizens, poised to make a difference in the world. Congratulations, Class of 2024. The world is yours to shape, and to improve. Never forget that the impossible is the untried, so please go out and make a difference.  Thank you all and God speed.  Read more
    By: Baboki Gaolaolwe-Major
    post image
  • +3
    Hello everyone, I am excited to join this group of great and promising scholars.
    By: AJIBO Chinenye Augustine
    post image
  • +3
    Hello everyone, I am excited to join this group of great and promising scholars.
    By: AJIBO Chinenye Augustine
    post image
  • +1
    Navigating the Complexities Building Bridges and Sustainable Impactful Networks in Research
    Summary: In a fast world where innovation and impact are critical slogans, researchers are required to build their partnerships and grow networks to advance research that transforms lives beyond academic papers. It is equally critical to know the intricacies of connecting with the right people and teams. This article unpacks some of the in ways around the complexities for researchers aiming to works across such environments. Farai Kapfudzaruwa is a Research and Strategic Partnerships Manager at Future Africa, University of Pretoria. People often say, “the world is becoming small”, when discussing meeting new friends and forming partnerships. This statement reflects the increased connectivity among people, facilitated by rapid transportation and advanced communication methods. However, does the idea of a shrinking world really make it a simple, smooth, and easy process to build sustainable and impactful networks? While the phrase "the world becomes small" suggests ease of navigation, it also brings to light increasingly intricate and complex environments. The kind of environments that are a compound of diverse cultures, trends, and knowledge systems, call for one to re-learn what they know. Neither research nor academia holds a special entry pass into this realm; they must navigate these intricate environments just like everyone else to advance research and societal knowledge. Only by doing so, we will manage to begin to tackle some of the most complex problems with strong bridges and networks.  As the principal investigator of the Africa-Asia Business Partnership Forum, co-funded by the Alliance for African Partnership (AAP), we navigated a myriad of complexities to drive the project towards success. This project brought together South African, Japanese, and US partners, encompassing academics, young entrepreneurs, and their value chain stakeholders. Farai and his team faced the challenge of managing cultural differences, a task that proved to be intricate. For instance, during the project’s initial virtual workshops, Japanese entrepreneurs, known for their quiet and reserved nature, found it difficult to adapt to the interactive format, in contrast to the vocal and assertive South African entrepreneurs. This innocent disparity is something that is usually overlooked and often not considered to be a thing to account for when conceptualising projects, but it can cause and lead to serious imbalance in sharing ideas and creating a levelled environment where thoughts circulate with ease. In this instance, this disparity led to the Japanese feeling overwhelmed.  To address these issues, the team acknowledged the significance of cultural sensitivities and redesigned the workshops to be more inclusive of Japanese participants. They also encountered diverse work cultures and problem-solving methods among the researchers, adding another layer of complexity to the project’s execution.  The foundational principles of effective networking always revolve around two key tenets. The first principle emphasizes the importance of understanding context. This entails understanding and recognizing that every individual, partner, community, or organization operates within a unique socio-cultural, knowledge system, resource-based, and personality-driven context. The second principle highlights the value of being open-minded and receptive to learning. Therefore, when initiating engagements with new partners, it is crucial to approach with an open mind and actively seek to comprehend their specific context.  Mutual respect amongst partners always ensures that diverse views and cultures are accounted for in a partnership. This entails understanding that each partner brings unique value to a project. Once everyone’s value is accounted for and appreciated it allows for equitable distribution of resources and tasks in the team. Often, Global South partners are portrayed as recipients of capacity-building support which then undermines their role in projects. This perception can arise from a lack of appreciation for their indigenous knowledge systems (IKS), which may be dismissed as insufficiently rigorous by Global North partners.  By taking the time to understand and respect the value of IKS, Global North partners can find value in the contributions of Global South partners. Furthermore, it’s one thing to understand, respect, and value a different cultural context or way of doing things in a partnership and another to take a key interest and learn a different context. Language is a good example, it's one thing to appreciate a different language and another thing to take an interest and attempt to learn that language to enable you to communicate more effectively with local partners.    Avoid the Misconceptions and Mix Things Up  One of the most prevalent and biggest misconceptions about networking is the belief that relationships should naturally form among researchers or partners who share similar backgrounds and priorities and who are from the same discipline and/or have aligned interests. However, within the context of transdisciplinarity, such relationships often lack innovation and diversity and exhibit significant homogeneity, as they predominantly involve partners with similar interests. In one of the projects that I lead at Future Africa, this is the core of what we do. Supported by the International Science Council, the project explores the idea of a Science Technology and Innovation (STI), Leadership Forum. STI isn't solely about the natural sciences. The project has gained traction by engaging a diverse array of experts and leaders across disciplines, including the social sciences. These professionals contribute their insights on integrating natural sciences with policy to enhance the African STI landscape. The impact of valuing and integrating varied disciplines and expertise has enriched our research methodologies and outcomes. Therefore, it is highly recommended to seek out networks that challenge you and offer diversity, as this creates opportunities for transformative impact. Engineers, for instance, are encouraged to actively cultivate and nurture relationships with sociologists or artists, as they can leverage each other's expertise for mutual benefit. Similarly, academics should strive to engage with sectors beyond academia, such as the private sector or government, to foster relevance and impact of research and teaching, thus catalyzing innovation across diverse fields.   Another common misconception revolves around the idea that networks are inherently self-serving. However, this is not the case. As an academic, you can actively participate in networks, such as community groups, where the focus is not on extracting value but on adding value and making a positive impact by transforming lives. I believe in the power of diverse networks to foster significant, transformative impacts, and I advocate for connections beyond traditional boundaries, such as those between engineers and sociologists or artists, to leverage unique expertise for mutual benefit. This strategy extends to academics engaging with sectors outside of academia, enhancing the relevance and impact of their work across different fields. For example, I am engaged in a network of Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) addressing child labor and sustainability in the wine industry which illustrates this point. My interaction with stakeholders like human rights lawyers and community leaders enriches my understanding of the problem, while my academic contributions to grant proposal writing and transformative partnerships underscore the value of reciprocal, impactful networking. This experience not only broadens my perspective but also significantly enhances the collective efforts towards sustainable and ethical practices in the industry. In essence, this example reflects a broader principle: networks should not be self-serving but rather avenues for adding value and effecting positive change. My involvement in both academic and non-academic networks highlights the dual benefits of recognition and the opportunity to mentor and support others, ultimately leading to a more interconnected and transformative impact across disciplines and sectors.  Attention to Newcomers in Academia  Firstly, start building networks at an early stage in your graduate studies at conferences, social gatherings, and many other places. Find mentors who can introduce you to their networks for you to benefit and learn. Secondly, always make an effort to engage with partners outside your comfort zone or your area of expertise or sector. You are more likely to be impactful from a research and teaching perspective if you always have a transdisciplinary lens to your work. This is critically important in an academic environment that increasingly values societal impact. If you work with local communities – show respect and value them.    Practical Techniques for Working Across Sectors and Cultural and knowledge Contexts  Given the diverse expertise and capacities in such partnerships, the key to ensuring impact and sustainability is to ensure everyone has input in setting the agenda and goals. As such, communicating and engaging on the project management plan early and transparently is essential. Secondly, clearly defining the roles of each partner based on their expertise and capabilities (resources and time) is key. This ensures there is accountability in the partnership. Thirdly, it’s important to develop reflexive practices which enable all the partners to contribute to the project through learning from others’ expertise, competencies and disciplines. For example, if you want to learn the value of government or civil society, the best way is through regular knowledge sharing sessions where partners share their expertise, competencies, and lessons learned. This can be an opportunity for individuals and partners to learn new skills and expertise. In scenarios like these, it's crucial to give everyone a voice. Adopting the "world café" concept, where workshop participants are divided into small groups, ensures that each partner can contribute their insights. In 2022, we organized a transdisciplinary capacity development workshop for early career researchers. The aim was to collaboratively design projects addressing global challenges. To break the ice, we introduced games that facilitated socialization and mutual acquaintance among participants. This strategy helped build rapport and relationships, enabling productive engagement throughout the week. Such interactive approaches can foster communication and collaboration in workshop settings.    Fourth, given the variety of backgrounds and competencies in these complex knowledge systems its always important to “speak the same language”. For example, simple tools such as documented communication guidelines, or glossary of terms can help data scientists and policy makers understand each other across disciplines. Fifth, use multidisciplinary approaches to ensure that everyone benefits. Generally, academics value “methods” whereas policymakers value results/practical outcomes. This means creating flexible design frameworks that can accommodate variable scope and unanticipated results. It is important to know that there is need for mutual benefit and there are several approaches to achieving a shared vison and outcome based on the nature of the stakeholder. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the preferred method of integrating multidisciplinary approaches to ensure that all partners benefit from the collaboration. Partners must therefore acknowledge the different priorities and perspectives of academic researchers and policymakers, highlighting the need for flexible design frameworks that can accommodate diverse goals and outcomes.  For example, a partnership focused on environmental conservation and policy development might involve academic researchers specializing in ecological studies, policymakers from government agencies, and environmental advocacy groups. Each partner brings unique strengths and priorities to the table. The academic researchers may prioritize rigorous scientific methodologies, data collection, and analysis techniques to understand ecosystem dynamics, species diversity, and environmental impacts while policymakers may prioritize actionable insights, policy recommendations, and practical solutions to address environmental challenges such as deforestation, pollution, and habitat loss. When designing the project, a flexible research framework that integrates both academic methodologies and policy-oriented outcomes is key. For example, academic researchers can conduct in-depth ecological studies using advanced data collection techniques, while also focusing on translating their findings into policy-relevant recommendations. In that way it's a win-win for both the academic and policy stakeholders.  Navigating ethical considerations across different cultural contexts poses a complex challenge. What may be deemed ethical in one region might not align with ethical standards elsewhere. Therefore, it is preferable to identify overarching principles that promote sustainable partnerships, such as steering clear of linguistic dominance and embracing epistemological flexibilities. Numerous global frameworks exist that outline these principles. However, the true challenge lies in integrating them into funding models, project frameworks, and institutional structures effectively. This requires a thoughtful approach that respects diverse perspectives and ensures ethical practices are embedded at every level of operation.  Using DEI to Frame Your in Partnerships and Networks  As the global landscape continues “to become smaller”, our interactions increasingly involve individuals from diverse backgrounds. It is imperative that we equip ourselves with the necessary skills to navigate the different cultural sensitivities. This includes understanding what makes people comfortable and acknowledging areas that may cause discomfort. It's crucial not only to consider our interactions with individuals but also to evaluate our treatment of marginalized groups such as women, youth, disabled individuals, LGBTQ+ communities, among others. How we treat these groups can significantly be seen as your institutional culture. Hence, it is vital to prioritize fairness, inclusivity, and a deep understanding at all levels of interaction. Attention to diversity and inclusion ensure there are different partners from different backgrounds with varying experiences and expertise. As a result, diverse networks offer broader perspectives as different people provide insights that others would never have considered or thought. Joining diverse and inclusive networks also brings new opportunities to partners – for example, new funding sources. A lot has also been written on the value of diversity and inclusion in promoting creativity and innovation.   Emerging Trends that Alter the World of Partnerships and Networking  The funding for higher education partnerships globally is diminishing. Therefore, networks that will be able to ensure impact and transformative impact with fewer resources will become more successful. This particularly, relates the movement to embrace artificial intelligence and machine learning in research and learning. AI is equipping students and communities with information processed faster (which has implications on how collaborative research is done), but also bridging access to quality knowledge. The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred the adoption of a new global work culture, characterized by widespread remote work practices. This shift has accelerated the use of virtual communication platforms, facilitating seamless connections and collaboration among individuals worldwide. This virtual communication culture presents a unique opportunity for the academia to build robust research and innovation networks. Virtual communication tools have broken down geographical barriers, allowing researchers, academics, and innovators from diverse backgrounds to connect effortlessly. This global connectivity fosters the exchange of ideas, knowledge sharing, and collaboration on a scale previously unattainable.  enable real-time collaboration on research projects, facilitating joint efforts and interdisciplinary approaches. Researchers can collaborate across institutions, disciplines, and even continents, leveraging each other's expertise and resources to drive innovation and scientific progress.   
    By: Abraham Mamela
    post image
  • +1
    Navigating the Complexities Building Bridges and Sustainable Impactful Networks in Research
    Summary: In a fast world where innovation and impact are critical slogans, researchers are required to build their partnerships and grow networks to advance research that transforms lives beyond academic papers. It is equally critical to know the intricacies of connecting with the right people and teams. This article unpacks some of the in ways around the complexities for researchers aiming to works across such environments. Farai Kapfudzaruwa is a Research and Strategic Partnerships Manager at Future Africa, University of Pretoria. People often say, “the world is becoming small”, when discussing meeting new friends and forming partnerships. This statement reflects the increased connectivity among people, facilitated by rapid transportation and advanced communication methods. However, does the idea of a shrinking world really make it a simple, smooth, and easy process to build sustainable and impactful networks? While the phrase "the world becomes small" suggests ease of navigation, it also brings to light increasingly intricate and complex environments. The kind of environments that are a compound of diverse cultures, trends, and knowledge systems, call for one to re-learn what they know. Neither research nor academia holds a special entry pass into this realm; they must navigate these intricate environments just like everyone else to advance research and societal knowledge. Only by doing so, we will manage to begin to tackle some of the most complex problems with strong bridges and networks.  As the principal investigator of the Africa-Asia Business Partnership Forum, co-funded by the Alliance for African Partnership (AAP), we navigated a myriad of complexities to drive the project towards success. This project brought together South African, Japanese, and US partners, encompassing academics, young entrepreneurs, and their value chain stakeholders. Farai and his team faced the challenge of managing cultural differences, a task that proved to be intricate. For instance, during the project’s initial virtual workshops, Japanese entrepreneurs, known for their quiet and reserved nature, found it difficult to adapt to the interactive format, in contrast to the vocal and assertive South African entrepreneurs. This innocent disparity is something that is usually overlooked and often not considered to be a thing to account for when conceptualising projects, but it can cause and lead to serious imbalance in sharing ideas and creating a levelled environment where thoughts circulate with ease. In this instance, this disparity led to the Japanese feeling overwhelmed.  To address these issues, the team acknowledged the significance of cultural sensitivities and redesigned the workshops to be more inclusive of Japanese participants. They also encountered diverse work cultures and problem-solving methods among the researchers, adding another layer of complexity to the project’s execution.  The foundational principles of effective networking always revolve around two key tenets. The first principle emphasizes the importance of understanding context. This entails understanding and recognizing that every individual, partner, community, or organization operates within a unique socio-cultural, knowledge system, resource-based, and personality-driven context. The second principle highlights the value of being open-minded and receptive to learning. Therefore, when initiating engagements with new partners, it is crucial to approach with an open mind and actively seek to comprehend their specific context.  Mutual respect amongst partners always ensures that diverse views and cultures are accounted for in a partnership. This entails understanding that each partner brings unique value to a project. Once everyone’s value is accounted for and appreciated it allows for equitable distribution of resources and tasks in the team. Often, Global South partners are portrayed as recipients of capacity-building support which then undermines their role in projects. This perception can arise from a lack of appreciation for their indigenous knowledge systems (IKS), which may be dismissed as insufficiently rigorous by Global North partners.  By taking the time to understand and respect the value of IKS, Global North partners can find value in the contributions of Global South partners. Furthermore, it’s one thing to understand, respect, and value a different cultural context or way of doing things in a partnership and another to take a key interest and learn a different context. Language is a good example, it's one thing to appreciate a different language and another thing to take an interest and attempt to learn that language to enable you to communicate more effectively with local partners.    Avoid the Misconceptions and Mix Things Up  One of the most prevalent and biggest misconceptions about networking is the belief that relationships should naturally form among researchers or partners who share similar backgrounds and priorities and who are from the same discipline and/or have aligned interests. However, within the context of transdisciplinarity, such relationships often lack innovation and diversity and exhibit significant homogeneity, as they predominantly involve partners with similar interests. In one of the projects that I lead at Future Africa, this is the core of what we do. Supported by the International Science Council, the project explores the idea of a Science Technology and Innovation (STI), Leadership Forum. STI isn't solely about the natural sciences. The project has gained traction by engaging a diverse array of experts and leaders across disciplines, including the social sciences. These professionals contribute their insights on integrating natural sciences with policy to enhance the African STI landscape. The impact of valuing and integrating varied disciplines and expertise has enriched our research methodologies and outcomes. Therefore, it is highly recommended to seek out networks that challenge you and offer diversity, as this creates opportunities for transformative impact. Engineers, for instance, are encouraged to actively cultivate and nurture relationships with sociologists or artists, as they can leverage each other's expertise for mutual benefit. Similarly, academics should strive to engage with sectors beyond academia, such as the private sector or government, to foster relevance and impact of research and teaching, thus catalyzing innovation across diverse fields.   Another common misconception revolves around the idea that networks are inherently self-serving. However, this is not the case. As an academic, you can actively participate in networks, such as community groups, where the focus is not on extracting value but on adding value and making a positive impact by transforming lives. I believe in the power of diverse networks to foster significant, transformative impacts, and I advocate for connections beyond traditional boundaries, such as those between engineers and sociologists or artists, to leverage unique expertise for mutual benefit. This strategy extends to academics engaging with sectors outside of academia, enhancing the relevance and impact of their work across different fields. For example, I am engaged in a network of Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) addressing child labor and sustainability in the wine industry which illustrates this point. My interaction with stakeholders like human rights lawyers and community leaders enriches my understanding of the problem, while my academic contributions to grant proposal writing and transformative partnerships underscore the value of reciprocal, impactful networking. This experience not only broadens my perspective but also significantly enhances the collective efforts towards sustainable and ethical practices in the industry. In essence, this example reflects a broader principle: networks should not be self-serving but rather avenues for adding value and effecting positive change. My involvement in both academic and non-academic networks highlights the dual benefits of recognition and the opportunity to mentor and support others, ultimately leading to a more interconnected and transformative impact across disciplines and sectors.  Attention to Newcomers in Academia  Firstly, start building networks at an early stage in your graduate studies at conferences, social gatherings, and many other places. Find mentors who can introduce you to their networks for you to benefit and learn. Secondly, always make an effort to engage with partners outside your comfort zone or your area of expertise or sector. You are more likely to be impactful from a research and teaching perspective if you always have a transdisciplinary lens to your work. This is critically important in an academic environment that increasingly values societal impact. If you work with local communities – show respect and value them.    Practical Techniques for Working Across Sectors and Cultural and knowledge Contexts  Given the diverse expertise and capacities in such partnerships, the key to ensuring impact and sustainability is to ensure everyone has input in setting the agenda and goals. As such, communicating and engaging on the project management plan early and transparently is essential. Secondly, clearly defining the roles of each partner based on their expertise and capabilities (resources and time) is key. This ensures there is accountability in the partnership. Thirdly, it’s important to develop reflexive practices which enable all the partners to contribute to the project through learning from others’ expertise, competencies and disciplines. For example, if you want to learn the value of government or civil society, the best way is through regular knowledge sharing sessions where partners share their expertise, competencies, and lessons learned. This can be an opportunity for individuals and partners to learn new skills and expertise. In scenarios like these, it's crucial to give everyone a voice. Adopting the "world café" concept, where workshop participants are divided into small groups, ensures that each partner can contribute their insights. In 2022, we organized a transdisciplinary capacity development workshop for early career researchers. The aim was to collaboratively design projects addressing global challenges. To break the ice, we introduced games that facilitated socialization and mutual acquaintance among participants. This strategy helped build rapport and relationships, enabling productive engagement throughout the week. Such interactive approaches can foster communication and collaboration in workshop settings.    Fourth, given the variety of backgrounds and competencies in these complex knowledge systems its always important to “speak the same language”. For example, simple tools such as documented communication guidelines, or glossary of terms can help data scientists and policy makers understand each other across disciplines. Fifth, use multidisciplinary approaches to ensure that everyone benefits. Generally, academics value “methods” whereas policymakers value results/practical outcomes. This means creating flexible design frameworks that can accommodate variable scope and unanticipated results. It is important to know that there is need for mutual benefit and there are several approaches to achieving a shared vison and outcome based on the nature of the stakeholder. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the preferred method of integrating multidisciplinary approaches to ensure that all partners benefit from the collaboration. Partners must therefore acknowledge the different priorities and perspectives of academic researchers and policymakers, highlighting the need for flexible design frameworks that can accommodate diverse goals and outcomes.  For example, a partnership focused on environmental conservation and policy development might involve academic researchers specializing in ecological studies, policymakers from government agencies, and environmental advocacy groups. Each partner brings unique strengths and priorities to the table. The academic researchers may prioritize rigorous scientific methodologies, data collection, and analysis techniques to understand ecosystem dynamics, species diversity, and environmental impacts while policymakers may prioritize actionable insights, policy recommendations, and practical solutions to address environmental challenges such as deforestation, pollution, and habitat loss. When designing the project, a flexible research framework that integrates both academic methodologies and policy-oriented outcomes is key. For example, academic researchers can conduct in-depth ecological studies using advanced data collection techniques, while also focusing on translating their findings into policy-relevant recommendations. In that way it's a win-win for both the academic and policy stakeholders.  Navigating ethical considerations across different cultural contexts poses a complex challenge. What may be deemed ethical in one region might not align with ethical standards elsewhere. Therefore, it is preferable to identify overarching principles that promote sustainable partnerships, such as steering clear of linguistic dominance and embracing epistemological flexibilities. Numerous global frameworks exist that outline these principles. However, the true challenge lies in integrating them into funding models, project frameworks, and institutional structures effectively. This requires a thoughtful approach that respects diverse perspectives and ensures ethical practices are embedded at every level of operation.  Using DEI to Frame Your in Partnerships and Networks  As the global landscape continues “to become smaller”, our interactions increasingly involve individuals from diverse backgrounds. It is imperative that we equip ourselves with the necessary skills to navigate the different cultural sensitivities. This includes understanding what makes people comfortable and acknowledging areas that may cause discomfort. It's crucial not only to consider our interactions with individuals but also to evaluate our treatment of marginalized groups such as women, youth, disabled individuals, LGBTQ+ communities, among others. How we treat these groups can significantly be seen as your institutional culture. Hence, it is vital to prioritize fairness, inclusivity, and a deep understanding at all levels of interaction. Attention to diversity and inclusion ensure there are different partners from different backgrounds with varying experiences and expertise. As a result, diverse networks offer broader perspectives as different people provide insights that others would never have considered or thought. Joining diverse and inclusive networks also brings new opportunities to partners – for example, new funding sources. A lot has also been written on the value of diversity and inclusion in promoting creativity and innovation.   Emerging Trends that Alter the World of Partnerships and Networking  The funding for higher education partnerships globally is diminishing. Therefore, networks that will be able to ensure impact and transformative impact with fewer resources will become more successful. This particularly, relates the movement to embrace artificial intelligence and machine learning in research and learning. AI is equipping students and communities with information processed faster (which has implications on how collaborative research is done), but also bridging access to quality knowledge. The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred the adoption of a new global work culture, characterized by widespread remote work practices. This shift has accelerated the use of virtual communication platforms, facilitating seamless connections and collaboration among individuals worldwide. This virtual communication culture presents a unique opportunity for the academia to build robust research and innovation networks. Virtual communication tools have broken down geographical barriers, allowing researchers, academics, and innovators from diverse backgrounds to connect effortlessly. This global connectivity fosters the exchange of ideas, knowledge sharing, and collaboration on a scale previously unattainable.  enable real-time collaboration on research projects, facilitating joint efforts and interdisciplinary approaches. Researchers can collaborate across institutions, disciplines, and even continents, leveraging each other's expertise and resources to drive innovation and scientific progress.    Read more
    By: Abraham Mamela
    post image
  • +1
    Attached to the Soil
    Attached to the Soil was begun during my 7-month Fulbright Scholar service in South Africa in 2019, inspired by the aspirational metaphor that President Nelson Mandela shared in the first words of his 1994 Inaugural Address.  Collaborating with youth who proposed their own soil-related metaphors regarding their perception of realities in South Africa's past, present, or future, the stories of their fellow South Africans were told through portraiture and stories drawn from oral history interviews.  The 50 works have been exhibited in 6 university art galleries across South Africa, and hung for 8 months in the Nelson Mandela Foundation's Centre of Memory, Houghton, Johannesburg.  It is a model that I would like to extend not only in South Africa but in service to youth across Africa.
    By: Peter Glendinning
  • +1
    Attached to the Soil
    Attached to the Soil was begun during my 7-month Fulbright Scholar service in South Africa in 2019, inspired by the aspirational metaphor that President Nelson Mandela shared in the first words of his 1994 Inaugural Address.  Collaborating with youth who proposed their own soil-related metaphors regarding their perception of realities in South Africa's past, present, or future, the stories of their fellow South Africans were told through portraiture and stories drawn from oral history interviews.  The 50 works have been exhibited in 6 university art galleries across South Africa, and hung for 8 months in the Nelson Mandela Foundation's Centre of Memory, Houghton, Johannesburg.  It is a model that I would like to extend not only in South Africa but in service to youth across Africa. Read more
    By: Peter Glendinning
  • +6
    Partnerships for Innovative Research in Africa (PIRA) Strategic Funding
    Partnerships for Innovative Research in Africa 2024 Call for ProposalsInfo session and Q&A slides The Alliance for African Partnership (AAP), a consortium of ten leading African universities, a distinguished research network for African research institute, and Michigan State University, is inviting proposals for its Partnerships for Innovative Research in Africa (PIRA) strategic funding program. As a consortium-wide initiative, PIRA is a tiered funding opportunity designed to cultivate and support multidirectional, collaborative research partnerships at any stage of their development, whether they are initiatives to explore and create new relationships or scale existing ones. One of the unique aspects to these grants is the expectation that organizations will establish and develop fair and equitable partnerships from conception to closeout of the project, involving local stakeholders throughout the project, respecting their knowledge and expertise, and taking an adaptive approach that is responsive to the local context. Proposals should outline processes to establish such partnerships. Fair and equitable partnerships must also be established among members of the consortium if multiple organizations are working on the implementation of the project. Proposed partnership activities may entail cooperative research, capacity building initiatives, outreach and/or other activities that align with AAP’s pillars of building bridges, transforming institutions, and transforming lives. Proposals must address at least one of AAP’s priority areas: agri-food systems; water, energy and  environment; culture and society; youth empowerment; education; health and nutrition; and, science, technology, and innovation. Proposals are encouraged from diverse disciplinary perspectives. Submitted proposals must include principal investigators from both MSU and at least one African AAP member university. The project implementation timeframe will be 18 months. FUNDING TIERS The tiered funding structure is designed to support partnerships at different stages of maturity to create and strengthen relationships among institutions and act as a catalyst for research teams in securing external funding that will allow for long-term engagement. Applicants should submit proposals for the funding tier that best fits the level of engagement established among the PIs on the research team. However, AAP management reserves the right to relegate proposals to a different tier if deemed more appropriate during review. To ensure broad impact, more awards will be given at the planning grant level than the scaling grant level. Proposed activities for each tier may include, but are not limited to: Planning Grants (up to $50,000), inception and early-stage partnership research activities, travel support for co-developing joint proposals (in accordance with all MSU travel guidelines), short-term capacity building trainings, network development, research symposia, or other activities that align with AAP’s priority themes and strategic objectives. Scaling Grants (up to $100,000), continuation of ongoing partnerships that have the potential to significantly scale their research, capacity building, or outreach activities, broader institutional linkages, or other activities that align with AAP’s priority themes and strategic objectives.  ELIGIBILITY The lead investigators for proposals must come from MSU and AAP African member universities. Proposals may also include partners from other institutions globally. Teams are encouraged to include partners from the private sector, governments, civil society organizations, and pan-African/global institutions. Individuals who were PIs or co-PIs on grants from the previous round of PIRA grants or AAP’s strategic partnership grants are not eligible to lead proposals under this call but may participate as team members. MSU ISP staff are not eligible to lead proposals. GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS All submissions must have a cover sheet and proposal narrative that includes the information listed below, a budget and budget narrative using the provided template, and letters of support. Please submit all application material via the application portal by Wednesday, August 14 at 11:59 PM EST. Application with the project's title as well as names, institutional affiliations, titles of all principal investigators, and a brief (about 100 words) project summary A proposal narrative, not to exceed 5,000 words with one appendix for references cited, that includes: A description of the partnership, containing: Capacity statements from each partner institution that outlines their respective strengths in relation to their proposed roles and responsibilities in the partnership A brief description of the past or ongoing partnership, if applicable The rationale for partnership and evidence that it will create or cultivate equitable, sustainable, and mutually beneficial partnerships A problem statement that identifies the shared challenges to be addressed by the program activities, the theory of change, their relevance to AAP’s themes and pillars Clearly defined objectives of the proposed partnership A description of program activities as well as a logical framework that connects the proposed activities with their intended outputs, outcomes, and programmatic objectives A timeline of activities A monitoring, evaluating, and learning plan that outlines proposed indicators and collection methods Identification of potential sources of additional funding that the partnership will pursue during the program’s period of performance A line-item budget and budget narrative using the template provided. Templates and more information on budgetary considerations are below in BUDGET. A letter of support from each partner’s department, institution, or organization; and A CV or resume of each principal investigator (1-page max). A letter of support for each PI from their dean or head of department that signifies buy-in from each partner at the institutional level. Please use the provided template SELECTION CRITERIA Program goals should align with at least one of AAP’s pillars: Building bridges: Bringing people and organizations together to work toward common goals. Illustrative activities under this objective include: sponsoring thematic symposia or workshops that bring people together across sectors and disciplines or travel for preparation of proposals for larger grant applications. This also includes network development, communications among research groups or networks (e.g. digital innovations and digital forums), dissemination of knowledge through online journals and/or sharing of best practices among partners Transforming institutions: Promoting sustainable and effective partnerships among institutions, enhancing resources, and increasing institutional capacity. Illustrative activities under this objective include: institutional capacity development at universities, NGOs, or in the public sector such as building financial management capacity, improving teaching and learning at universities, and/or increasing proposal development skills, among others. Transforming lives: Supporting research with real-world impact that improves African lives and livelihoods. Illustrative activities under this objective include: putting research into action through evidence-based outreach and engagement, conducting early-stage research that has obvious potential to impact lives and livelihoods, improving dissemination of research outputs to practitioners and policy-makers, and/or designing innovative research-into-practice methodologies.  Submitted proposals will be evaluated according to the following criteria: Evidence of a collaborative and equitable partnership that strengthens personal, professional, and/or institutional networks in a mutually beneficial and sustainable way. Other AAP principles that need to be demonstrated in the proposal and later in the implementation are mutual trust and respect, sustainability, innovativeness, co-creation, accountability, transparency, flexibility as well as multi-disciplinarity and trans-disciplinarity. Alignment of proposed activities and program goal(s) to AAP’s 3 strategic objectives and 7 priority areas. Potential for program deliverables to significantly contribute to their respective academic, technical, or technological fields. Potential to create innovative models of community engagement and development that positively impact people’s lives. Potential for principal investigators to attract and or leverage additional external funding to sustain program’s impact. A thorough monitoring, evaluating, and learning plan that links program activities to their intended outputs and outcomes and includes a clear description of the MEL tools that will be used, what indicators will be measured, and a timeline for evaluation and reporting. Gender equality, equity and inclusion are core values of AAP and are thus central to this call. All projects funded must demonstrate how they follow principles of gender and inclusion and should explain how applicants will integrate gender, equity, and inclusion issues in all stages of the project, including rationale, design, intended results, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and knowledge mobilization processes. BUDGET PIRA BUDGET TEMPLATE [.XLSX] Using the template provided, applicants must submit a line-item budget and budget narrative for the life of the program that details each institution’s requested budget as well as an overall budget summary. Suggested line items are provided as guidelines but are not comprehensive or required. Proposed budgets should be co-created by the partnership teams and reflect an equitable distribution of funds, with each institution completing a separate tab within the budget template to show the anticipated disbursement of resources and cost sharing broken down by yearly expenditures. The budget narrative should clearly explain how the line items are calculated and for what purpose they will be used in achieving the program’s objectives. Please note that the MSU PI and their home department will be responsible for the financial administration of the award. As such, it is required that the MSU PI involve their department’s fiscal officer in the development of the proposed budget to ensure all financial guidelines and reporting requirements are met. Please submit budgets as an Excel file or similar formatted version that allows the reviewers to view the formulas used in the calculations. Communications and Engagement10% of the total requested funds must be earmarked for communication and engagement efforts. For example, if a team is requesting a scaling grant for $100,000, at least $10,000 of that must be budgeted for communication and engagement efforts, such as developing creative projects that translate the research, engagement workshops and developing and utilizing dissemination tools such as video production, creation of digital resources, community engagement activities, etc. Cost Share 10% of the total requested funds must be matched with contributions (monetary and/or in-kind) from all partners. The Co-PIs’ colleges, faculties. and/or departments will be expected to contribute to the costs of the proposed activities to ensure that the commitment to long-term partnering is shared by these units.  Ineligible Expenses While funding may be used for a variety of activities, the following expenses are not eligible to be covered with the PIRA grants: Regular salary of MSU faculty (summer salary is allowable) Indirect costs (IDC) Equipment exceeding $5,000 Construction-related costs  Total project salary & fringe cannot exceed 30% of total combined project budget. SELECTION PROCESS Proposals will initially be reviewed by the AAP management team according to the guidelines and criteria above. Short-listed applications will be assessed by external peer reviewers for quality of technical content. Final selections will be made by the AAP management team in consultation with its internal partners and consortium members. SUBMISSION AND AWARD TIMELINE APPLICATION PORTAL Full proposal packages are due on Wednesday, August 14 at 11:59 PM EST and awards will be announced by early October. AAP management will work with awardees to finalize the plan and budget by November 20, 2024. Programs may begin according to their timeline but not before a final work plan and budget has been approved by AAP management. Programs must begin no later than January 22, 2025 and all program activities must be completed within 18 months of the start date. Progress will be due to AAP management at regular intervals throughout implementation. In addition, AAP will be conducting intermittent surveys of the awardees to evaluate the PIRA grant-making process and how successfully it embodies the AAP’s values of equity, transparency, and accountability.
    By: Justin Rabineau
    poster image
  • +6
    Partnerships for Innovative Research in Africa (PIRA) Strategic Funding
    Partnerships for Innovative Research in Africa 2024 Call for ProposalsInfo session and Q&A slides The Alliance for African Partnership (AAP), a consortium of ten leading African universities, a distinguished research network for African research institute, and Michigan State University, is inviting proposals for its Partnerships for Innovative Research in Africa (PIRA) strategic funding program. As a consortium-wide initiative, PIRA is a tiered funding opportunity designed to cultivate and support multidirectional, collaborative research partnerships at any stage of their development, whether they are initiatives to explore and create new relationships or scale existing ones. One of the unique aspects to these grants is the expectation that organizations will establish and develop fair and equitable partnerships from conception to closeout of the project, involving local stakeholders throughout the project, respecting their knowledge and expertise, and taking an adaptive approach that is responsive to the local context. Proposals should outline processes to establish such partnerships. Fair and equitable partnerships must also be established among members of the consortium if multiple organizations are working on the implementation of the project. Proposed partnership activities may entail cooperative research, capacity building initiatives, outreach and/or other activities that align with AAP’s pillars of building bridges, transforming institutions, and transforming lives. Proposals must address at least one of AAP’s priority areas: agri-food systems; water, energy and  environment; culture and society; youth empowerment; education; health and nutrition; and, science, technology, and innovation. Proposals are encouraged from diverse disciplinary perspectives. Submitted proposals must include principal investigators from both MSU and at least one African AAP member university. The project implementation timeframe will be 18 months. FUNDING TIERS The tiered funding structure is designed to support partnerships at different stages of maturity to create and strengthen relationships among institutions and act as a catalyst for research teams in securing external funding that will allow for long-term engagement. Applicants should submit proposals for the funding tier that best fits the level of engagement established among the PIs on the research team. However, AAP management reserves the right to relegate proposals to a different tier if deemed more appropriate during review. To ensure broad impact, more awards will be given at the planning grant level than the scaling grant level. Proposed activities for each tier may include, but are not limited to: Planning Grants (up to $50,000), inception and early-stage partnership research activities, travel support for co-developing joint proposals (in accordance with all MSU travel guidelines), short-term capacity building trainings, network development, research symposia, or other activities that align with AAP’s priority themes and strategic objectives. Scaling Grants (up to $100,000), continuation of ongoing partnerships that have the potential to significantly scale their research, capacity building, or outreach activities, broader institutional linkages, or other activities that align with AAP’s priority themes and strategic objectives.  ELIGIBILITY The lead investigators for proposals must come from MSU and AAP African member universities. Proposals may also include partners from other institutions globally. Teams are encouraged to include partners from the private sector, governments, civil society organizations, and pan-African/global institutions. Individuals who were PIs or co-PIs on grants from the previous round of PIRA grants or AAP’s strategic partnership grants are not eligible to lead proposals under this call but may participate as team members. MSU ISP staff are not eligible to lead proposals. GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS All submissions must have a cover sheet and proposal narrative that includes the information listed below, a budget and budget narrative using the provided template, and letters of support. Please submit all application material via the application portal by Wednesday, August 14 at 11:59 PM EST. Application with the project's title as well as names, institutional affiliations, titles of all principal investigators, and a brief (about 100 words) project summary A proposal narrative, not to exceed 5,000 words with one appendix for references cited, that includes: A description of the partnership, containing: Capacity statements from each partner institution that outlines their respective strengths in relation to their proposed roles and responsibilities in the partnership A brief description of the past or ongoing partnership, if applicable The rationale for partnership and evidence that it will create or cultivate equitable, sustainable, and mutually beneficial partnerships A problem statement that identifies the shared challenges to be addressed by the program activities, the theory of change, their relevance to AAP’s themes and pillars Clearly defined objectives of the proposed partnership A description of program activities as well as a logical framework that connects the proposed activities with their intended outputs, outcomes, and programmatic objectives A timeline of activities A monitoring, evaluating, and learning plan that outlines proposed indicators and collection methods Identification of potential sources of additional funding that the partnership will pursue during the program’s period of performance A line-item budget and budget narrative using the template provided. Templates and more information on budgetary considerations are below in BUDGET. A letter of support from each partner’s department, institution, or organization; and A CV or resume of each principal investigator (1-page max). A letter of support for each PI from their dean or head of department that signifies buy-in from each partner at the institutional level. Please use the provided template SELECTION CRITERIA Program goals should align with at least one of AAP’s pillars: Building bridges: Bringing people and organizations together to work toward common goals. Illustrative activities under this objective include: sponsoring thematic symposia or workshops that bring people together across sectors and disciplines or travel for preparation of proposals for larger grant applications. This also includes network development, communications among research groups or networks (e.g. digital innovations and digital forums), dissemination of knowledge through online journals and/or sharing of best practices among partners Transforming institutions: Promoting sustainable and effective partnerships among institutions, enhancing resources, and increasing institutional capacity. Illustrative activities under this objective include: institutional capacity development at universities, NGOs, or in the public sector such as building financial management capacity, improving teaching and learning at universities, and/or increasing proposal development skills, among others. Transforming lives: Supporting research with real-world impact that improves African lives and livelihoods. Illustrative activities under this objective include: putting research into action through evidence-based outreach and engagement, conducting early-stage research that has obvious potential to impact lives and livelihoods, improving dissemination of research outputs to practitioners and policy-makers, and/or designing innovative research-into-practice methodologies.  Submitted proposals will be evaluated according to the following criteria: Evidence of a collaborative and equitable partnership that strengthens personal, professional, and/or institutional networks in a mutually beneficial and sustainable way. Other AAP principles that need to be demonstrated in the proposal and later in the implementation are mutual trust and respect, sustainability, innovativeness, co-creation, accountability, transparency, flexibility as well as multi-disciplinarity and trans-disciplinarity. Alignment of proposed activities and program goal(s) to AAP’s 3 strategic objectives and 7 priority areas. Potential for program deliverables to significantly contribute to their respective academic, technical, or technological fields. Potential to create innovative models of community engagement and development that positively impact people’s lives. Potential for principal investigators to attract and or leverage additional external funding to sustain program’s impact. A thorough monitoring, evaluating, and learning plan that links program activities to their intended outputs and outcomes and includes a clear description of the MEL tools that will be used, what indicators will be measured, and a timeline for evaluation and reporting. Gender equality, equity and inclusion are core values of AAP and are thus central to this call. All projects funded must demonstrate how they follow principles of gender and inclusion and should explain how applicants will integrate gender, equity, and inclusion issues in all stages of the project, including rationale, design, intended results, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and knowledge mobilization processes. BUDGET PIRA BUDGET TEMPLATE [.XLSX] Using the template provided, applicants must submit a line-item budget and budget narrative for the life of the program that details each institution’s requested budget as well as an overall budget summary. Suggested line items are provided as guidelines but are not comprehensive or required. Proposed budgets should be co-created by the partnership teams and reflect an equitable distribution of funds, with each institution completing a separate tab within the budget template to show the anticipated disbursement of resources and cost sharing broken down by yearly expenditures. The budget narrative should clearly explain how the line items are calculated and for what purpose they will be used in achieving the program’s objectives. Please note that the MSU PI and their home department will be responsible for the financial administration of the award. As such, it is required that the MSU PI involve their department’s fiscal officer in the development of the proposed budget to ensure all financial guidelines and reporting requirements are met. Please submit budgets as an Excel file or similar formatted version that allows the reviewers to view the formulas used in the calculations. Communications and Engagement10% of the total requested funds must be earmarked for communication and engagement efforts. For example, if a team is requesting a scaling grant for $100,000, at least $10,000 of that must be budgeted for communication and engagement efforts, such as developing creative projects that translate the research, engagement workshops and developing and utilizing dissemination tools such as video production, creation of digital resources, community engagement activities, etc. Cost Share 10% of the total requested funds must be matched with contributions (monetary and/or in-kind) from all partners. The Co-PIs’ colleges, faculties. and/or departments will be expected to contribute to the costs of the proposed activities to ensure that the commitment to long-term partnering is shared by these units.  Ineligible Expenses While funding may be used for a variety of activities, the following expenses are not eligible to be covered with the PIRA grants: Regular salary of MSU faculty (summer salary is allowable) Indirect costs (IDC) Equipment exceeding $5,000 Construction-related costs  Total project salary & fringe cannot exceed 30% of total combined project budget. SELECTION PROCESS Proposals will initially be reviewed by the AAP management team according to the guidelines and criteria above. Short-listed applications will be assessed by external peer reviewers for quality of technical content. Final selections will be made by the AAP management team in consultation with its internal partners and consortium members. SUBMISSION AND AWARD TIMELINE APPLICATION PORTAL Full proposal packages are due on Wednesday, August 14 at 11:59 PM EST and awards will be announced by early October. AAP management will work with awardees to finalize the plan and budget by November 20, 2024. Programs may begin according to their timeline but not before a final work plan and budget has been approved by AAP management. Programs must begin no later than January 22, 2025 and all program activities must be completed within 18 months of the start date. Progress will be due to AAP management at regular intervals throughout implementation. In addition, AAP will be conducting intermittent surveys of the awardees to evaluate the PIRA grant-making process and how successfully it embodies the AAP’s values of equity, transparency, and accountability. Read more
    By: Justin Rabineau
    poster image
  • +6
    Transforming Institutions Strategic Funding
    AAP seeks proposals from consortium members and their partners for projects that directly address AAP's Transforming Institutions pillar - transforming institutions to be better able to participate in sustainable, equitable, and research-driven partnerships that make a broader impact on transforming lives. Successful applicants will receive up to $20,000 USD in seed funding to develop international strategic partnerships with universities, institutions of higher education and research, and/or organizations in the public and/or NGO sectors.  Proposed projects should focus specifically on institutional and capacity strengthening. This could include projects that: aim to reinforce institutional strengths; contribute to individuals’ capacity strengthening, which will lead to institutional strengthening; plan for the creation of new units or institution-wide initiatives; and/or pilot new approaches to support research, teaching, or outreach that can be scaled up across the institution(s).Some specific examples of the types of programs that could fall under this funding initiative: developing plans or programs to improve institutional financial management structures, building capacity of administrative units or leaders, improving structures for outreach and research dissemination, creating new and innovative curricula or pedagogical approaches in priority areas, strengthening student service units focused on various aspects of student success, or institutional programs to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (for faculty staff, and/or students). Proposals that solely focus on research topics unrelated to institutional capacity strengthening and do not directly address how the work contributes to institutional strengthening will not be considered. I. Guidelines Proposals may be submitted in one of the following three project categories in support of institutional strengthening and capacity development: Exploratory Projects to support initial-stage partnership development. This funding is meant for new partnerships that have not previously worked together Proposal Development Projects to support partners to develop a proposal in response to a specific funding opportunity  Pilot Workshop Projects to support short-term training activities or workshops We highly encourage projects that incorporate South-South collaboration. This has been identified as an AAP priority and will be factored into the selection process. We also encourage collaboration across Francophone and Anglophone countries/consortium members. Proposals that address at least one of the following focus areas will receive priority in review: student success financial management systems diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) science communication  Details on funding and development of applicants’ project budget: Applicants can request a maximum of $20,000 USD.  Funding can cover travel and/or associated meeting or workshop costs. The budget may also cover salary/fringe expenses up to a total of $5,000 USD. Travel can include any of the following—within Africa, to Africa from external locations, from Africa to the US, or to other locations outside of Africa. Virtual engagement is highly encouraged as it can be cost effective. Applicants are required to contribute 20% in cost share for the project, in addition to the amount that AAP awards. For example, if an applicant requests $20,000 from AAP, the applicants will need to contribute a total of an additional $4,000 in cost share to the project, so that the total budget for the project would be $24,000.  Cost share refers to the resources a recipient contributes to the total cost of an agreement. Cost share can be cash, in-kind contributions (such as donated time of a faculty member) or a combination of the two.  The cost share required is a combined 20% contribution across all the partner institutions, with each institution contributing some amount. It must be verified in a letter of endorsement from the applicant partner institution leadership (e.g., Dean). Please see the link to the template that AAP has provided under Section IV. Proposal Requirements. MSU PI’s should identify the relevant fiscal officer within their department and verify within the budget template    Indirect costs are not allowed. This is because AAP is an entity directly funded by Michigan State University. Projects funded by AAP do not allow for indirect, administrative, or contingent costs. AAP policy allows funding only for those activities that can be directly attributed to the funded project. Applicants are responsible for communicating with and receiving approvals from appropriate administrative, research, or finance offices at their institutions and to verify that they understand that indirect costs are not allowed under this grant program. II. Eligibility Proposals should include co-PIs (project leads) from each of the partner institutions included in the proposal. Proposals must include PI(s) from MSU and PI(s) from at least one other AAP consortium member (Egerton University, Makerere University, University of Dar es Salaam, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Botswana, University of Nigeria-Nsukka, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Université des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de Bamako, University of Pretoria, United States International University – Africa, and ANAPRI). As mentioned above, AAP highly encourages South-South collaboration and proposals with multiple consortium members and/or additional partners are welcomed.  Priority will be given to PIs who have not received funding from AAP previously through any AAP-funded program. Faculty members may only be listed (as PI or as team member) on one proposal submitted to AAP for each round of funding. AAP will work with successful applicants to verify a timeline for when activities will be completed. (Partnership teams should carry out projects between June 3, 2024 and August 29, 2025). Awarded funds must be transferred to the MSU PI's department by June 30, 2024. III. Evaluation Criteria Criteria that will be used to evaluate the proposals includes: Evidence of a shared vision and mutually beneficial interests among the partners, and   a joint commitment to the success of the proposed partnership Clarity of the connection of proposed activities to AAP’s Transforming Institutions pillar Demonstrated integration of gender, equity, and inclusion principles Quality of short-term outputs/outcomes of proposed activities Potential for a sustained, productive partnership; quality of long-term impacts of proposed activities Potential for leveraging significant external funding Indicators used to evaluate the outputs/outcomes of completed projects include: Evidence of continued productive collaboration among partner institutions around transforming all organizations involved in the partnership The number and quality of institutional improvements that stem from partnership activities Symposia or conferences held to disseminate work stemming from partnership activities Collaborative grant applications submitted and awarded Collaborative research publications completed Other measures of institutional transformation as proposed by the implementing teams Reporting: A follow-up report including data on these criteria will be required 30 days after the project end date. IV. Partnership Activities Proposed partnerships should center on capacity strengthening activities, including external funding proposal development and dissemination of outputs, which contribute to transformation at all partnering institutions. Proposed activities should ultimately lead to potential long-term collaborations among the partner institutions. Follow-on funding may be allocated for continued support to develop these partnerships depending on the outcomes of the initial budget and availability of funds. V. Partnership Funding Transforming Institutions partnership funds will provide partial support of travel, meeting, and workshop costs for AAP consortium faculty members and their partners. The Co-PIs’ colleges, faculties. and/or departments will be expected to contribute to the costs of the proposed activities to ensure that the commitment to long-term partnering is shared by these units. A total of 20% match (monetary and/or in-kind) is required with contributions from all partners. These awards should ultimately result in the development and submission of a collaborative funding proposal (including partner institution faculty) for external funding, as well as having positive impacts on other indicators of institutional transformation. VI. Proposal Requirements Proposals must be submitted in English via the online submission form linked below and should include the following documents: Narrative (maximum of five pages), which addresses the specific areas below. Please use these as section headings in the proposal, which will help applicants organize their proposals and help the reviewers score the proposals.  The proposed topics or issues that the activities will address The activities being proposed for this funding. Please include a description of the activities, the role of each partner, and the timeline.  A general description of the partners and individuals who will take part in the project  The history of partnership among those involved and the potential for sustained future engagement A description of the partners’ shared vision and how each partner will benefit from the proposed activities Considerations taken for gender, equity, and inclusion (in terms of the team members and the project activities) How the activities will contribute to transforming all the institutions included in the partnership. Please describe the objectives of the activities, the anticipated short-term outcomes of the project, and their relation to the institutions’ needs The anticipated longer-term outcomes and impact of the proposed activities Identification of external funding opportunities that could support the proposed research/activities in the future Short project summary (200 words maximum) giving an overview of the work proposed including expected impacts, project outputs, etc. Letters of endorsement from each applicants’ deans, department chairpersons, or supervisors committing to a total minimum of 20% matching funds, providing a description of any monetary or in-kind contributions from each partner institution, and acknowledging that indirect costs are not allowed. Please use the provided letter of endorsement template. Proposed itemized budget. Please use the provided budget template. VII. Submitting a Proposal Please submit proposals via our online submission form. In addition to the information required on the submission form, be sure to include all required documents listed above in (narrative, letters of endorsement, proposed budget using the provided template). Submission deadline: March 1, 2024 (11:59pm EST)  Questions Please contact AAP Program Manager Justin Rabineau (rabinea1@msu.edu) or AAP Co-Director Amy Jamison at (jamisona@msu.edu) with any questions.
    By: Justin Rabineau
    poster image
  • +6
    Transforming Institutions Strategic Funding
    AAP seeks proposals from consortium members and their partners for projects that directly address AAP's Transforming Institutions pillar - transforming institutions to be better able to participate in sustainable, equitable, and research-driven partnerships that make a broader impact on transforming lives. Successful applicants will receive up to $20,000 USD in seed funding to develop international strategic partnerships with universities, institutions of higher education and research, and/or organizations in the public and/or NGO sectors.  Proposed projects should focus specifically on institutional and capacity strengthening. This could include projects that: aim to reinforce institutional strengths; contribute to individuals’ capacity strengthening, which will lead to institutional strengthening; plan for the creation of new units or institution-wide initiatives; and/or pilot new approaches to support research, teaching, or outreach that can be scaled up across the institution(s).Some specific examples of the types of programs that could fall under this funding initiative: developing plans or programs to improve institutional financial management structures, building capacity of administrative units or leaders, improving structures for outreach and research dissemination, creating new and innovative curricula or pedagogical approaches in priority areas, strengthening student service units focused on various aspects of student success, or institutional programs to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (for faculty staff, and/or students). Proposals that solely focus on research topics unrelated to institutional capacity strengthening and do not directly address how the work contributes to institutional strengthening will not be considered. I. Guidelines Proposals may be submitted in one of the following three project categories in support of institutional strengthening and capacity development: Exploratory Projects to support initial-stage partnership development. This funding is meant for new partnerships that have not previously worked together Proposal Development Projects to support partners to develop a proposal in response to a specific funding opportunity  Pilot Workshop Projects to support short-term training activities or workshops We highly encourage projects that incorporate South-South collaboration. This has been identified as an AAP priority and will be factored into the selection process. We also encourage collaboration across Francophone and Anglophone countries/consortium members. Proposals that address at least one of the following focus areas will receive priority in review: student success financial management systems diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) science communication  Details on funding and development of applicants’ project budget: Applicants can request a maximum of $20,000 USD.  Funding can cover travel and/or associated meeting or workshop costs. The budget may also cover salary/fringe expenses up to a total of $5,000 USD. Travel can include any of the following—within Africa, to Africa from external locations, from Africa to the US, or to other locations outside of Africa. Virtual engagement is highly encouraged as it can be cost effective. Applicants are required to contribute 20% in cost share for the project, in addition to the amount that AAP awards. For example, if an applicant requests $20,000 from AAP, the applicants will need to contribute a total of an additional $4,000 in cost share to the project, so that the total budget for the project would be $24,000.  Cost share refers to the resources a recipient contributes to the total cost of an agreement. Cost share can be cash, in-kind contributions (such as donated time of a faculty member) or a combination of the two.  The cost share required is a combined 20% contribution across all the partner institutions, with each institution contributing some amount. It must be verified in a letter of endorsement from the applicant partner institution leadership (e.g., Dean). Please see the link to the template that AAP has provided under Section IV. Proposal Requirements. MSU PI’s should identify the relevant fiscal officer within their department and verify within the budget template    Indirect costs are not allowed. This is because AAP is an entity directly funded by Michigan State University. Projects funded by AAP do not allow for indirect, administrative, or contingent costs. AAP policy allows funding only for those activities that can be directly attributed to the funded project. Applicants are responsible for communicating with and receiving approvals from appropriate administrative, research, or finance offices at their institutions and to verify that they understand that indirect costs are not allowed under this grant program. II. Eligibility Proposals should include co-PIs (project leads) from each of the partner institutions included in the proposal. Proposals must include PI(s) from MSU and PI(s) from at least one other AAP consortium member (Egerton University, Makerere University, University of Dar es Salaam, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Botswana, University of Nigeria-Nsukka, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Université des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines de Bamako, University of Pretoria, United States International University – Africa, and ANAPRI). As mentioned above, AAP highly encourages South-South collaboration and proposals with multiple consortium members and/or additional partners are welcomed.  Priority will be given to PIs who have not received funding from AAP previously through any AAP-funded program. Faculty members may only be listed (as PI or as team member) on one proposal submitted to AAP for each round of funding. AAP will work with successful applicants to verify a timeline for when activities will be completed. (Partnership teams should carry out projects between June 3, 2024 and August 29, 2025). Awarded funds must be transferred to the MSU PI's department by June 30, 2024. III. Evaluation Criteria Criteria that will be used to evaluate the proposals includes: Evidence of a shared vision and mutually beneficial interests among the partners, and   a joint commitment to the success of the proposed partnership Clarity of the connection of proposed activities to AAP’s Transforming Institutions pillar Demonstrated integration of gender, equity, and inclusion principles Quality of short-term outputs/outcomes of proposed activities Potential for a sustained, productive partnership; quality of long-term impacts of proposed activities Potential for leveraging significant external funding Indicators used to evaluate the outputs/outcomes of completed projects include: Evidence of continued productive collaboration among partner institutions around transforming all organizations involved in the partnership The number and quality of institutional improvements that stem from partnership activities Symposia or conferences held to disseminate work stemming from partnership activities Collaborative grant applications submitted and awarded Collaborative research publications completed Other measures of institutional transformation as proposed by the implementing teams Reporting: A follow-up report including data on these criteria will be required 30 days after the project end date. IV. Partnership Activities Proposed partnerships should center on capacity strengthening activities, including external funding proposal development and dissemination of outputs, which contribute to transformation at all partnering institutions. Proposed activities should ultimately lead to potential long-term collaborations among the partner institutions. Follow-on funding may be allocated for continued support to develop these partnerships depending on the outcomes of the initial budget and availability of funds. V. Partnership Funding Transforming Institutions partnership funds will provide partial support of travel, meeting, and workshop costs for AAP consortium faculty members and their partners. The Co-PIs’ colleges, faculties. and/or departments will be expected to contribute to the costs of the proposed activities to ensure that the commitment to long-term partnering is shared by these units. A total of 20% match (monetary and/or in-kind) is required with contributions from all partners. These awards should ultimately result in the development and submission of a collaborative funding proposal (including partner institution faculty) for external funding, as well as having positive impacts on other indicators of institutional transformation. VI. Proposal Requirements Proposals must be submitted in English via the online submission form linked below and should include the following documents: Narrative (maximum of five pages), which addresses the specific areas below. Please use these as section headings in the proposal, which will help applicants organize their proposals and help the reviewers score the proposals.  The proposed topics or issues that the activities will address The activities being proposed for this funding. Please include a description of the activities, the role of each partner, and the timeline.  A general description of the partners and individuals who will take part in the project  The history of partnership among those involved and the potential for sustained future engagement A description of the partners’ shared vision and how each partner will benefit from the proposed activities Considerations taken for gender, equity, and inclusion (in terms of the team members and the project activities) How the activities will contribute to transforming all the institutions included in the partnership. Please describe the objectives of the activities, the anticipated short-term outcomes of the project, and their relation to the institutions’ needs The anticipated longer-term outcomes and impact of the proposed activities Identification of external funding opportunities that could support the proposed research/activities in the future Short project summary (200 words maximum) giving an overview of the work proposed including expected impacts, project outputs, etc. Letters of endorsement from each applicants’ deans, department chairpersons, or supervisors committing to a total minimum of 20% matching funds, providing a description of any monetary or in-kind contributions from each partner institution, and acknowledging that indirect costs are not allowed. Please use the provided letter of endorsement template. Proposed itemized budget. Please use the provided budget template. VII. Submitting a Proposal Please submit proposals via our online submission form. In addition to the information required on the submission form, be sure to include all required documents listed above in (narrative, letters of endorsement, proposed budget using the provided template). Submission deadline: March 1, 2024 (11:59pm EST)  Questions Please contact AAP Program Manager Justin Rabineau (rabinea1@msu.edu) or AAP Co-Director Amy Jamison at (jamisona@msu.edu) with any questions. Read more
    By: Justin Rabineau
    poster image
  • +1
    CFP: Summer School ‘service – servility – servitude’.
    SERVICE–SERVILITY–SERVITUDE CALL FOR PAPERS—SUMMER SCHOOL Labour history has long been framed through the ‘free/unfree’ divide. Moreover, slavery as well as wage labour, indentured work and convict labour, as well as other labour relations, have traditionally been studied in isolation from each other. In the last decades, however, labour historians have highlight- ed the need to move beyond the ‘free/unfree’ divide (van der Linden and Brass, 1997; van der Linden 2008), expanded the range of labour relations un- der study, and insisted on the relevance of a proces- sual perspective (De Vito, Schiel and van Rossum, 2020; Schiel and Heinsen, forthcoming). Especially the latter approach highlights the complex making of labour coercion, and offers the possibility to re- think key concepts, e.g. the ‘working class’, and pe-riodisations in labour history. Building on these new insights, the summer school foregrounds the potential of the concepts of ‘service’, ‘servility’ and ‘servitude’ to provide further entry points into this expanded labour history. At the same time, it seeks to uncover the historical importance of service and servile forms of labour that have been marginalized through discourses that focus on ‘free/ unfree’ labour, or have been addressed within isolat- ed fields of research. We think of labour regimes as diverse as family la- bour or domestic service, we look at shopworkers sharing work-spaces as well as close social ties in an Asian ‘bazaar’, we address inmates who worked in private households, or doing service as a pun- ishment for certain crimes, workers in ‘informal’ backyard manufacturing units, farm hands living on  the margins of agricultural households, or tributary and enslaved workers tied to service provision with- in the relationship to their ‘employers’ or polity. The triad of ‘service – servility – servitude’ operates as a structuring element particularly for types of work marked by high socio-spatial proximity with capital, one that provides an alternative facet for the inquiry into labour relations and enriches our understanding of the complexities of labour coercion. Thus, we are not only expanding the scope of current discourses on labour, but also the theoretical – more often than not binary – framework often applied. Using the triad ‘service – servility – servitude’ opens up new perspectives in the study of labour, and will consider overlooked histories. We seek to bring together early-career and estab- lished scholars working in the field from across the world, specifically highlighting the implications of studies on and from the Global South towards our understanding of global modernities in labour re- gimes without restricting our inquiry by excluding the contexts of the Global North. The summer school is designed to allow PhD students not only to present their own work, but also to engage with theoretical and methodological questions in training groups organized and moderated by established scholars. Reading sessions of key texts from diverse regions, small reading groups and discussing writing meth- ods will provide a space for students to openly dis- cuss challenges faced during research and writing phases. Participants are encouraged to suggest or provide a paper or a source which inspired their re- search. The summer school will be held at the Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói-Brazil. It is open to grad-uate students in history, sociology, anthropology, and archaeology, based in any part the world. We welcome paper proposals: •focusing on any geographical and chrono- logical context; • addressing different aspects of the triad ‘ser- vice – servility – servitude’; •exploring aspects like race, gender, sexuali- ty, and even an intersectionality perspective in connection to the applicants’ research themes.   Please submit your paper proposal (approx. 500 words), abstract, a short summary of you argument, current affiliation and short bio-note latest by 15 July, 2023 to: paulocruzterra@id.uff.br Subject: Summer school: Service – Servility – Servitude Candidates with PhD funding are expected to fund their trips. However, candidates without funding can apply in their application for support of their travel expenses. You will be informed about the outcome of your application by 15 August 2023. Successful applicants will be expected to pre-circulate their papers among the participants by 30 October 2023. For further information and queries, please contact: Paulo Cruz Terra - paulocruzterra@id.uff.br Michaela Dimmers - dimmers@mwsindia.org Organizers Paulo Cruz Terra, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói-Brazil Christian G. De Vito, Bonn Center for Development and Slavery Studies, Bonn, GermanyMichaela Dimmers, Max Weber Forum for South Asian Studies, Delhi, India and Centre for Modern Indian Studies, Göttingen, GermanySebastian Schwecke, Max Weber Forum for South Asian Studies, Delhi, India Nitin Varma, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany   https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/networks.h-net.org/user/login?destination=node*12878235__;Lw!!HXCxUKc!xG5cbwfRnov-_t-LpqbdmKgrFR4aMSR-jpJ-WKppfFGWfbc_46W3Wl5bm0vTb77mKSxcc-a89NQmldaz8PKLLeW2UPnw$  
    By: Raquel Acosta
  • +1
    CFP: Summer School ‘service – servility – servitude’.
    SERVICE–SERVILITY–SERVITUDE CALL FOR PAPERS—SUMMER SCHOOL Labour history has long been framed through the ‘free/unfree’ divide. Moreover, slavery as well as wage labour, indentured work and convict labour, as well as other labour relations, have traditionally been studied in isolation from each other. In the last decades, however, labour historians have highlight- ed the need to move beyond the ‘free/unfree’ divide (van der Linden and Brass, 1997; van der Linden 2008), expanded the range of labour relations un- der study, and insisted on the relevance of a proces- sual perspective (De Vito, Schiel and van Rossum, 2020; Schiel and Heinsen, forthcoming). Especially the latter approach highlights the complex making of labour coercion, and offers the possibility to re- think key concepts, e.g. the ‘working class’, and pe-riodisations in labour history. Building on these new insights, the summer school foregrounds the potential of the concepts of ‘service’, ‘servility’ and ‘servitude’ to provide further entry points into this expanded labour history. At the same time, it seeks to uncover the historical importance of service and servile forms of labour that have been marginalized through discourses that focus on ‘free/ unfree’ labour, or have been addressed within isolat- ed fields of research. We think of labour regimes as diverse as family la- bour or domestic service, we look at shopworkers sharing work-spaces as well as close social ties in an Asian ‘bazaar’, we address inmates who worked in private households, or doing service as a pun- ishment for certain crimes, workers in ‘informal’ backyard manufacturing units, farm hands living on  the margins of agricultural households, or tributary and enslaved workers tied to service provision with- in the relationship to their ‘employers’ or polity. The triad of ‘service – servility – servitude’ operates as a structuring element particularly for types of work marked by high socio-spatial proximity with capital, one that provides an alternative facet for the inquiry into labour relations and enriches our understanding of the complexities of labour coercion. Thus, we are not only expanding the scope of current discourses on labour, but also the theoretical – more often than not binary – framework often applied. Using the triad ‘service – servility – servitude’ opens up new perspectives in the study of labour, and will consider overlooked histories. We seek to bring together early-career and estab- lished scholars working in the field from across the world, specifically highlighting the implications of studies on and from the Global South towards our understanding of global modernities in labour re- gimes without restricting our inquiry by excluding the contexts of the Global North. The summer school is designed to allow PhD students not only to present their own work, but also to engage with theoretical and methodological questions in training groups organized and moderated by established scholars. Reading sessions of key texts from diverse regions, small reading groups and discussing writing meth- ods will provide a space for students to openly dis- cuss challenges faced during research and writing phases. Participants are encouraged to suggest or provide a paper or a source which inspired their re- search. The summer school will be held at the Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói-Brazil. It is open to grad-uate students in history, sociology, anthropology, and archaeology, based in any part the world. We welcome paper proposals: •focusing on any geographical and chrono- logical context; • addressing different aspects of the triad ‘ser- vice – servility – servitude’; •exploring aspects like race, gender, sexuali- ty, and even an intersectionality perspective in connection to the applicants’ research themes.   Please submit your paper proposal (approx. 500 words), abstract, a short summary of you argument, current affiliation and short bio-note latest by 15 July, 2023 to: paulocruzterra@id.uff.br Subject: Summer school: Service – Servility – Servitude Candidates with PhD funding are expected to fund their trips. However, candidates without funding can apply in their application for support of their travel expenses. You will be informed about the outcome of your application by 15 August 2023. Successful applicants will be expected to pre-circulate their papers among the participants by 30 October 2023. For further information and queries, please contact: Paulo Cruz Terra - paulocruzterra@id.uff.br Michaela Dimmers - dimmers@mwsindia.org Organizers Paulo Cruz Terra, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói-Brazil Christian G. De Vito, Bonn Center for Development and Slavery Studies, Bonn, GermanyMichaela Dimmers, Max Weber Forum for South Asian Studies, Delhi, India and Centre for Modern Indian Studies, Göttingen, GermanySebastian Schwecke, Max Weber Forum for South Asian Studies, Delhi, India Nitin Varma, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany   https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/networks.h-net.org/user/login?destination=node*12878235__;Lw!!HXCxUKc!xG5cbwfRnov-_t-LpqbdmKgrFR4aMSR-jpJ-WKppfFGWfbc_46W3Wl5bm0vTb77mKSxcc-a89NQmldaz8PKLLeW2UPnw$   Read more
    By: Raquel Acosta

  • Call for Papers: Colonialism and Development
    Yearbook for the History of Global Development ed. Iris Borowy, George Bob-Milliars, Nicholas Ferns, and Corinna R. Unger   Colonialism and Development Joseph Hodge, Miguel Bandeira Jerónimo, and Sarah Stockwell, coords.   Call for Papers The historical understanding of the multifaceted trajectories of development – as a set of contested discourses, as multiple institutional complexes and as a heterogenous repertoire of policies and practices – has evolved significantly in the past few years. This scholarship has included a fresh historical assessment of ‘colonial development’, critically engaging with its varying chronologies and dynamics; geographies and actors; motivations and ends; and its repertoires and consequences, planned and unintended. We now have a rich literature that engages with the diverse contexts, dynamics and problems of development and its intersection with other major historical phenomena of the twentieth century, such as the institutionalization of international organizations, the intensification of urbanization and industrialization, the widening of globalizing dynamics and global integration, decolonization, and the emergence of the ‘Cold War’ and the ´Third World’. This volume aims to register many of these historiographical achievements specifically as they relate to colonialism offering a critical overview of existing scholarship and documenting its variety and richness, while also probing existing chronologies (e.g., the colonial/postcolonial) and geographies of development. While engaging with established fields of interest (for example, those related to international development; the relationship between science and development; and the connected histories of politics and development in a context of global decolonization), the volume seeks to open up new avenues of enquiry by adopting a more capacious approach to ‘colonial development’. It proposes to do this, first, by incorporating a wide range of empires and sites of development and exploring their connected histories, focusing on the circulation, and selective appropriation, of ideas, knowledge, human resources, and of capital and goods associated with development. Secondly, the volume will foreground a greater variety of state actors than usual (the military, for example) as well as the non-state actors that alongside colonial, international, and trans- and inter-imperial organizations were key players in the historical unfolding of development in colonial contexts. These non-state actors include missionaries, churches, NGOS, and philanthropic agencies; and banks, commercial organizations, and especially, mining and plantation companies. Finally, the volume will explore development in all its different modalities. These might include  representations and other cultural expressions of development (from literature and film to advertising); the techniques, technologies and the business of development (including infrastructures, patent history, and companies); ecological issues (from environmental consequences to the birth of ‘sustainable development’); the gendered dynamics associated with developmental discourses and practices; or the role played by racism and forms of racialization in the formulation and enactment of development policies (including in relation to population politics, and the spatialization of difference and welfare policies). The expansive approach taken by our volume will be underpinned by two methodological goals. The first is to promote the cross-fertilization of historiographies focused on (colonial) development and those dealing with human rights, humanitarianism, philanthropy, welfare, security, and business. For example, contributions to the volume might explore the intersection between developmental projects and educational and welfare schemes (e.g., housing or public health). Second, the edited collection seeks to incorporate local voices and arguments, expanding the number of individuals and communities (men and women) understood as contributing to the dynamics of development (e.g., farmers, workers, ‘traditional’ authorities and white settlers, diverse ‘middleman groups’, and ‘experts’). It will seek to recover their inspirations and expectations, resources and agency, aims, solidarities and commitments. In short, a (plural) view from the ‘global south’, including its articulation with wider individual and institutional networks (in the ‘global north’, but also in other geographies of the ‘global south’) is fundamental to new, critical histories of (colonial) development. The editors would welcome contributions dealing with these questions and addressing the following themes (including contributions that connect two or more themes), to be published at the series Yearbook for the History of Global Development (De Gruyter: https://www.degruyter.com/serial/yhgd-b/html?lang=en#volumes ), in early 2025: (1) Genealogies of colonial development: chronologies and periodizations (2) Geographies colonial development: the spatialities, scales, and sites of developmentalism (3) The internationalization of (colonial) development: national, international, transnational, inter-imperial and trans-imperial, connected histories of development (4) Trajectories of colonial development: experts and expertise, networks and careers; (5) Cultures and manifestations of colonial development: representations and materialities of development (6) Gendered development: women and the historical dynamics of developmentalism (7) The political economy of development: techniques, technologies, and the business of developmentalism (8) The sciences of development: knowledge, institutions, practices (9) The racialization of development: race and racism in the idioms and repertoires of development (10) The agents of developmentalism: state and non-state actors (11) Ecologies of development: environmental problems and consequences (12) Development and the ‘social question’ in colonial contexts: connected histories of welfare, education, humanitarianism, human rights, housing. (13) The infrastructures of development: communication, energy, logistics (14) Repressive developmentalisms: the intersections between security and development   If interested, please send your proposal (title, abstract of 300–500 words, and a 2-page CV) to colonialism.development@gmail.com by August 30, 2023.
    By: Raquel Acosta

  • Call for Papers: Colonialism and Development
    Yearbook for the History of Global Development ed. Iris Borowy, George Bob-Milliars, Nicholas Ferns, and Corinna R. Unger   Colonialism and Development Joseph Hodge, Miguel Bandeira Jerónimo, and Sarah Stockwell, coords.   Call for Papers The historical understanding of the multifaceted trajectories of development – as a set of contested discourses, as multiple institutional complexes and as a heterogenous repertoire of policies and practices – has evolved significantly in the past few years. This scholarship has included a fresh historical assessment of ‘colonial development’, critically engaging with its varying chronologies and dynamics; geographies and actors; motivations and ends; and its repertoires and consequences, planned and unintended. We now have a rich literature that engages with the diverse contexts, dynamics and problems of development and its intersection with other major historical phenomena of the twentieth century, such as the institutionalization of international organizations, the intensification of urbanization and industrialization, the widening of globalizing dynamics and global integration, decolonization, and the emergence of the ‘Cold War’ and the ´Third World’. This volume aims to register many of these historiographical achievements specifically as they relate to colonialism offering a critical overview of existing scholarship and documenting its variety and richness, while also probing existing chronologies (e.g., the colonial/postcolonial) and geographies of development. While engaging with established fields of interest (for example, those related to international development; the relationship between science and development; and the connected histories of politics and development in a context of global decolonization), the volume seeks to open up new avenues of enquiry by adopting a more capacious approach to ‘colonial development’. It proposes to do this, first, by incorporating a wide range of empires and sites of development and exploring their connected histories, focusing on the circulation, and selective appropriation, of ideas, knowledge, human resources, and of capital and goods associated with development. Secondly, the volume will foreground a greater variety of state actors than usual (the military, for example) as well as the non-state actors that alongside colonial, international, and trans- and inter-imperial organizations were key players in the historical unfolding of development in colonial contexts. These non-state actors include missionaries, churches, NGOS, and philanthropic agencies; and banks, commercial organizations, and especially, mining and plantation companies. Finally, the volume will explore development in all its different modalities. These might include  representations and other cultural expressions of development (from literature and film to advertising); the techniques, technologies and the business of development (including infrastructures, patent history, and companies); ecological issues (from environmental consequences to the birth of ‘sustainable development’); the gendered dynamics associated with developmental discourses and practices; or the role played by racism and forms of racialization in the formulation and enactment of development policies (including in relation to population politics, and the spatialization of difference and welfare policies). The expansive approach taken by our volume will be underpinned by two methodological goals. The first is to promote the cross-fertilization of historiographies focused on (colonial) development and those dealing with human rights, humanitarianism, philanthropy, welfare, security, and business. For example, contributions to the volume might explore the intersection between developmental projects and educational and welfare schemes (e.g., housing or public health). Second, the edited collection seeks to incorporate local voices and arguments, expanding the number of individuals and communities (men and women) understood as contributing to the dynamics of development (e.g., farmers, workers, ‘traditional’ authorities and white settlers, diverse ‘middleman groups’, and ‘experts’). It will seek to recover their inspirations and expectations, resources and agency, aims, solidarities and commitments. In short, a (plural) view from the ‘global south’, including its articulation with wider individual and institutional networks (in the ‘global north’, but also in other geographies of the ‘global south’) is fundamental to new, critical histories of (colonial) development. The editors would welcome contributions dealing with these questions and addressing the following themes (including contributions that connect two or more themes), to be published at the series Yearbook for the History of Global Development (De Gruyter: https://www.degruyter.com/serial/yhgd-b/html?lang=en#volumes ), in early 2025: (1) Genealogies of colonial development: chronologies and periodizations (2) Geographies colonial development: the spatialities, scales, and sites of developmentalism (3) The internationalization of (colonial) development: national, international, transnational, inter-imperial and trans-imperial, connected histories of development (4) Trajectories of colonial development: experts and expertise, networks and careers; (5) Cultures and manifestations of colonial development: representations and materialities of development (6) Gendered development: women and the historical dynamics of developmentalism (7) The political economy of development: techniques, technologies, and the business of developmentalism (8) The sciences of development: knowledge, institutions, practices (9) The racialization of development: race and racism in the idioms and repertoires of development (10) The agents of developmentalism: state and non-state actors (11) Ecologies of development: environmental problems and consequences (12) Development and the ‘social question’ in colonial contexts: connected histories of welfare, education, humanitarianism, human rights, housing. (13) The infrastructures of development: communication, energy, logistics (14) Repressive developmentalisms: the intersections between security and development   If interested, please send your proposal (title, abstract of 300–500 words, and a 2-page CV) to colonialism.development@gmail.com by August 30, 2023. Read more
    By: Raquel Acosta
  • loading category
    loading